Reform Marijuana Laws NORML Site Map Contact Us About Marijuana Law Reform Media Contact About Marijuana Law Reform Home
Working to reform marijuana laws
search by
Click here to navigate by map
State Laws | Leyes Estatales
 
 
 
 
 
Get NORML's eZine
Meet Others, Share Stories
Get NORML's eZine
Legislative Alerts, News & Analysis from NORML

Details & Privacy


Home > News Archive > 2003 > Supreme Court Turns Back Feds' Appeal To Punish Pot Docs

Supreme Court Turns Back Feds' Appeal To Punish Pot Docs

Share This Page Share This Page on digg Share This Page on Reddit Share This Page on del.icio.us Share This Page on Stumble Upon Share This Page on Facebook Share This Page on Twitter

October 16, 2003 - Washington, DC, USA

Washington, DC: The Supreme Court this week declined to review a unanimous Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding the rights of physicians to discuss the medicinal use of marijuana with their patients. The Bush administration had asked the Supreme Court in July to overturn the ruling, arguing that it prevented the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) from protecting the public from the threat of illegal drugs.

By rejecting the government's appeal, the Court upheld the Ninth Circuit's October 2002 decision enjoining the Justice Department from revoking physicians' federal licenses to prescribe medicine if they discuss marijuana with their patients. In eight states, the possession and use of marijuana is legal if a physician recommends it.

"All the way up the chain - from the US District Court, to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, to the US Supreme Court - the courts have unequivocally stated that a physician's recommendation to his or her patient to engage in marijuana therapy is Constitutionally protected speech," said NORML Executive Director Keith Stroup. "This decision by the Supreme Court frees physicians who wish to discuss the use of medicinal cannabis with their patients from the heavy-hand of government intrusion or sanction."

Writing for the Ninth Circuit last October, Chief Judge Mary Schroeder opined that a doctor's recommendation regarding the use of medicinal marijuana "does not itself constitute illegal conduct" and therefore "does not interfere with the federal government's ability to enforce its laws."

Plaintiffs in the case - a coalition of California physicians and patients - initially filed suit in 1997, shortly after federal officials threatened to sanction any doctors who complied with California's Proposition 215, the "Medical Use of Marijuana Act." US District Judge Fern Smith issued a preliminary injunction against the Justice Department in 1997. That injunction was made permanent in 2000.

For more information, please contact NORML Executive Director Keith Stroup at (202) 483-5500.

    updated: Oct 16, 2003

Share This Page Share This Page on digg Share This Page on Reddit Share This Page on del.icio.us Share This Page on Stumble Upon Share This Page on Facebook Share This Page on Twitter

2009   2008   2007   2006   2005   2004   2003   2002   2001   2000   1999   1998   1997   1996  
Country State/Prov Year Month
Join the NORML Legal Committee
Features
Features
   
NORML
Site MapContact UsSupport NORMLTake ActionLibrary
© 2009 NORML • Privacy StatementSite Terms • Site by Communicopia and Red Aphid
NORML and the NORML Foundation: 1600 K Street NW, Suite 501, Washington DC, 20006-2832
Tel: (202) 483-5500 • Fax: (202) 483-0057 • Email: norml@norml.org