Reform Marijuana Laws NORML Site Map Contact Us About Marijuana Law Reform Media Contact About Marijuana Law Reform Home
Working to reform marijuana laws
search by
Click here to navigate by map
State Laws | Leyes Estatales
 
 
 
 
 
Get NORML's eZine
Meet Others, Share Stories
Get NORML's eZine
Legislative Alerts, News & Analysis from NORML

Details & Privacy


Home > News Archive > 2003 > Feds Lack Authority To Arrest Pot Patients

Feds Lack Authority To Arrest Pot Patients

Share This Page Share This Page on digg Share This Page on Reddit Share This Page on del.icio.us Share This Page on Stumble Upon Share This Page on Facebook Share This Page on Twitter

December 18, 2003 - San Francisco, CA, USA

Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Says Non-Commercial Cultivation, Possession And Use of Medicinal Marijuana Doesn't Violate The Control Substances Act

San Francisco, CA: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 this week that federal prosecution of patients who possess and cultivate marijuana for their own medicinal use is an unconstitutional exercise of Congress' Commerce Clause authority. As a result, the court ordered a preliminary injunction barring the Justice Department from arresting the plaintiffs - California medical marijuana patients Angel Raich and Diane Monson - for violating the Controlled Substances Act.

"As applied to the limited class of activities presented by this case, ... the cultivation, possession and use of marijuana for medicinal purposes and not for exchange or distribution is not properly characterized as commercial or economic activity," as defined by the CSA, a majority of the court determined. "This conclusion, coupled with the public interest considerations and the burden faced by the appellants if, contrary to California law, they are denied access to medicinal marijuana, warrants the entry of a preliminary injunction."

NORML Executive Director Keith Stroup praised the Ninth Circuit's opinion. "This is a crack in the blanket federal prohibition of marijuana, the first ever recognized by the federal courts," he said. "The court found that Congress may not allege that all drug offenses impact interstate commerce per se. Unless the offense actually impacts interstate commerce, the federal government has no legal authority to criminalize that conduct."

Stroup also noted that the ruling could have widespread significance in states with medical marijuana use laws in the Ninth Circuit. "While this restraining order only protects the individuals who brought this legal challenge, the ruling has the potential to protect all users living in states in the Ninth Circuit who cultivate and possess marijuana for their own personal medical use with their doctor's permission."

Stroup said that the ruling did not address plaintiffs' additional arguments that federal prosecution of California patients violates the Fifth, Ninth and 10th amendments.

For more information, please contact either Keith Stroup at (202) 483-5500 or California NORML Coordinator Dale Gieringer at (415) 563-5858. Full text of the court's decision may be found at:
http://www.freedomtoexhale.com/ruling.pdf

    updated: Dec 18, 2003

Share This Page Share This Page on digg Share This Page on Reddit Share This Page on del.icio.us Share This Page on Stumble Upon Share This Page on Facebook Share This Page on Twitter

2009   2008   2007   2006   2005   2004   2003   2002   2001   2000   1999   1998   1997   1996  
Country State/Prov Year Month
Join the NORML Legal Committee
Features
Features
   
NORML
Site MapContact UsSupport NORMLTake ActionLibrary
© 2009 NORML • Privacy StatementSite Terms • Site by Communicopia and Red Aphid
NORML and the NORML Foundation: 1600 K Street NW, Suite 501, Washington DC, 20006-2832
Tel: (202) 483-5500 • Fax: (202) 483-0057 • Email: norml@norml.org