Loading
Donate

Idaho Arrest Rates

State Arrest Report PDF Marijuana Arrests By Rate 1995 - 1997

1995

1996

1997

1995 to 1997



NAME


TL


AQ


RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


RANK


CHANGE


RANK
Idaho 3,023 0.93 259.93 2,811 0.81 236.42 2,854 0.82 235.87 - -9.26% -
Boise 6 2.13 129.95 1 0.37 21.19 36 3.82 749.53 1 476.76% 1
Valley 32 0.83 408.27 58 1.49 723.91 61 1.54 748.37 2 83.30% 6
Caribou 22 1.66 298.47 48 2.77 637.03 40 1.75 521.72 3 74.80% 7
Payette 63 1.16 323.81 58 1.02 291.62 83 1.56 410.12 4 26.66% 15
Shoshone 59 1.28 414.44 50 0.97 343.62 59 1.11 398.51 5 -3.84% 22
Gem 47 1.24 339.99 45 0.88 318.43 56 1.10 389.40 6 14.53% 17
Kootenai 351 1.41 391.80 331 1.22 361.40 324 0.98 347.62 7 -11.28% 28
Ada 1,043 1.14 417.56 869 0.88 340.22 865 0.97 332.70 8 -20.32% 33
Benewah 15 1.64 171.15 17 1.06 189.75 26 1.33 285.21 9 66.64% 9
Adams 7 0.61 177.17 18 1.73 445.65 11 1.09 267.64 10 51.06% 11
Boundary 35 2.57 371.12 38 1.96 394.15 25 1.18 254.84 11 -31.33% 37
Blaine 41 0.84 249.83 55 0.98 327.85 42 0.87 246.06 12 -1.51% 20
Clark 2 1.22 239.52 0 0.00 0.00 2 1.05 230.41 13 -3.80% 21
Bonneville 205 0.91 252.12 183 0.85 220.14 188 0.93 222.24 14 -11.85% 30
Lewis 4 0.99 101.55 2 0.22 49.68 9 0.91 219.73 15 116.38% 4
Teton 4 0.72 91.28 1 0.13 22.33 10 1.48 219.39 16 140.35% 3
Nez Perce 96 0.76 257.30 100 0.64 262.17 83 0.46 213.83 17 -16.89% 32
Twin Falls 157 1.12 261.64 87 0.63 141.82 126 0.79 201.84 18 -22.86% 35
Canyon 209 0.56 194.97 222 0.57 202.58 216 0.65 193.69 19 -0.66% 19
Idaho 16 0.60 106.86 26 0.93 169.87 29 0.89 186.20 20 74.24% 8
Bingham 65 0.68 154.51 72 0.64 167.41 78 0.74 178.23 21 15.35% 16
Custer 5 0.68 122.28 3 0.37 71.77 7 0.76 164.59 22 34.60% 13
Bonner 28 0.51 85.54 52 0.74 155.39 55 0.57 161.51 23 88.82% 5
Bannock 180 0.57 247.22 145 0.46 194.80 119 0.41 157.10 24 -36.45% 39
Gooding 15 0.84 115.27 13 0.70 97.73 21 1.16 155.15 25 34.60% 14
Cassia 36 0.48 168.52 20 0.27 91.58 34 0.45 152.99 26 -9.22% 27
Jerome 26 1.13 152.62 27 0.96 155.03 26 0.67 146.71 27 -3.87% 26
Elmore 37 1.05 159.59 71 1.63 299.55 34 0.79 140.97 28 -11.67% 29
Lemhi 11 1.21 144.34 9 0.90 115.52 11 0.91 138.77 29 -3.86% 23
Madison 32 1.09 131.30 30 0.88 120.40 35 1.00 138.04 30 5.13% 18
Minidoka 17 0.52 80.02 13 0.35 59.85 29 0.76 131.20 31 63.97% 10
Camas NR - - 1 1.42 120.34 1 0.69 118.34 32 - -
Power 6 0.29 74.07 11 0.54 132.85 9 0.34 106.82 33 44.21% 12
Lincoln 5 0.85 136.50 5 0.77 133.55 4 0.63 105.01 34 -23.07% 36
Latah 51 1.01 153.94 39 0.70 115.15 34 0.51 98.65 35 -35.92% 38
Owyhee 18 1.03 193.74 13 0.60 136.87 9 0.48 93.12 36 -51.93% 42
Clearwater 9 0.55 96.77 17 1.22 178.82 9 0.61 93.03 37 -3.87% 24
Bear Lake 2 0.42 30.33 2 0.42 29.67 6 1.11 87.48 38 188.45% 2
Franklin 11 0.59 106.41 19 1.16 179.81 9 0.47 83.70 39 -21.35% 34
Washington 8 0.37 85.20 5 0.25 52.09 8 0.37 81.90 40 -3.87% 25
Jefferson 16 0.62 84.59 14 0.56 72.41 14 0.48 71.15 41 -15.89% 31
Fremont (w/ Yellowstone Park) 15 1.14 126.81 14 1.00 115.77 8 0.50 65.01 42 -48.73% 40
Oneida 4 0.54 106.58 6 0.57 156.41 2 0.28 51.24 43 -51.92% 41
Butte 12 2.05 384.12 1 0.23 31.32 1 0.52 30.78 44 -91.99% 43

Notes:

NR:None Reported.

TL: Total Marijuana Arrests Reported.

AQ: Arrest Quotient. This indicator compares local marijuana arrests to national marijuana arrests in proportion to all arrests. The AQ is produced through dividing the local percentage of marijuana arrests by the national percentage. A value of 1.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are the same percentage of all arrests as the are nationally. A value of 2.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are twice the percentage of local arrests as they are nationally. AQ values less than 1.0 indicate that local marijuana arrests are less of a percentage of all local arrests than the national standard. A value of .5 indicates that local marijuana arrests are one half the percentage they represent of all national arrests.

RATE: Marijuana arrest rate per 100,000 population.

CHANGE: Percent change in arrest rate from 1995 to 1997.

Citation: Gettman, Jon B. (2000) "US Marijuana Arrests. Part One – County Level Data" Washington, D.C.: National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

Original Data Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest And Offense Data, [Computer files]. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1999.