Loading
Donate

Minnesota Arrests

State Arrest Report PDF Marijuana Arrests By County 1995 - 1997

1995

1996

1997

1995 to 1997

NAME

TL

AQ



RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


RANK


CHANGE


RANK
Minnesota 8,598 0.90 186.51 9,538 0.90 204.77 10,560 1.07 225.35 - 20.83% -
Aitkin 2 0.23 15.02 4 0.56 29.73 3 0.29 22.16 77 47.58% 29
Anoka 489 0.95 179.18 580 1.01 210.34 635 1.05 228.92 29 27.76% 37
Becker 59 0.68 202.28 66 0.75 223.95 46 0.65 155.16 43 -23.29% 63
Beltrami 61 0.44 161.61 100 0.68 262.22 86 0.58 224.17 32 38.71% 33
Benton 34 0.77 134.00 30 1.04 117.02 35 0.89 135.72 48 1.28% 53
Big Stone 17 1.36 280.30 3 0.24 48.96 7 0.57 113.58 53 -59.48% 71
Blue Earth 79 0.47 144.87 103 0.57 186.95 172 0.70 310.32 18 114.20% 14
Brown 37 0.82 135.52 23 0.56 83.38 30 0.59 108.11 56 -20.23% 61
Carlton 56 0.87 183.07 109 1.57 352.68 272 2.52 874.91 1 377.90% 7
Carver 62 0.73 108.61 62 0.70 107.50 78 0.66 134.43 49 23.78% 40
Cass 33 0.74 136.94 45 0.83 184.82 40 0.70 163.31 39 19.25% 48
Chippewa 2 0.23 15.98 3 0.29 23.72 11 0.96 86.46 61 441.18% 3
Chisago 55 0.86 153.82 41 0.85 113.49 103 1.64 283.41 22 84.24% 18
Clay 103 0.68 196.72 127 0.81 240.06 186 0.99 349.49 16 77.66% 19
Clearwater NR - - NR - - 1 0.12 11.72 78 - -
Cook 17 1.47 385.14 26 2.84 583.09 36 3.72 802.68 2 108.41% 15
Cottonwood 3 0.30 23.77 9 0.72 70.59 20 1.15 155.95 42 556.01% 2
Crow Wing 85 0.85 172.31 86 0.93 172.55 65 1.07 129.64 50 -24.76% 65
Dakota 710 1.20 227.95 909 1.30 288.84 1,178 1.40 372.09 14 63.23% 25
Dodge 10 0.34 59.90 11 0.50 65.22 13 0.61 76.62 62 27.91% 36
Douglas 43 0.78 142.00 81 1.21 264.73 73 0.97 237.17 27 67.02% 22
Faribault 13 0.69 77.81 6 0.42 35.55 9 0.62 53.00 65 -31.88% 67
Fillmore 6 0.87 28.64 3 0.69 14.17 NR - - - - -
Freeborn 112 1.16 342.42 107 0.87 323.78 140 1.13 421.12 8 22.98% 42
Goodhue 148 2.04 353.31 134 1.67 316.61 165 1.79 387.55 13 9.69% 51
Grant 15 1.13 242.40 21 1.49 335.89 15 1.02 238.51 26 -1.61% 54
Hennepin 2,423 0.90 228.10 2,474 0.84 230.47 1,914 1.02 177.21 35 -22.31% 62
Houston 45 1.41 233.23 23 0.81 117.99 9 0.59 45.90 66 -80.32% 73
Hubbard 13 0.59 80.88 18 0.71 110.84 6 0.16 36.73 70 -54.59% 70
Isanti 4 0.13 14.23 55 1.37 193.68 81 1.99 283.54 21 1892.39% 1
Itasca 80 1.93 185.34 15 0.83 34.39 15 0.42 34.19 71 -81.55% 74
Jackson 7 0.48 58.92 11 0.78 91.64 NR - - - - -
Kanabec 17 0.63 126.50 20 0.59 147.31 21 0.54 153.76 44 21.55% 46
Kandiyohi 96 0.90 234.51 116 0.92 280.45 165 1.04 396.54 10 69.10% 21
Kittson 9 2.53 163.16 2 0.20 35.89 13 1.54 231.94 28 42.15% 32
Koochiching 39 1.34 240.49 54 1.75 329.57 103 2.59 624.92 4 159.86% 11
Lac qui Parle NR - - 3 1.06 34.57 10 2.59 114.55 52 - -
Lake 2 0.51 18.81 NR - - 3 0.49 27.76 74 47.60% 28
Lake of the Woods 18 4.11 408.35 22 4.38 494.05 23 4.16 513.51 6 25.75% 39
Le Sueur 6 0.57 26.79 18 1.33 79.56 10 0.53 43.94 67 63.98% 24
Lincoln 7 0.80 101.91 0 0.00 0.00 NR - - - - -
Lyon 53 0.88 210.34 42 0.78 164.98 66 1.28 257.71 24 22.52% 44
Mahnomen NR - - 6 0.63 114.92 2 0.08 38.08 69 - -
Marshall 4 0.55 37.30 NR - - 3 0.47 27.52 75 -26.21% 66
Martin 28 0.88 123.22 20 0.56 87.11 39 1.01 168.87 38 37.05% 34
McLeod 49 0.72 146.65 57 0.67 168.84 82 0.87 241.46 25 64.66% 23
Meeker 40 1.66 187.24 23 0.78 106.56 37 0.61 170.41 37 -8.99% 58
Mille Lacs 92 1.34 463.24 95 0.95 473.44 104 0.90 515.21 5 11.22% 50
Morrison 9 0.42 29.67 8 0.39 26.10 7 0.34 22.70 76 -23.48% 64
Mower 23 0.25 60.78 47 0.47 122.93 54 0.38 140.40 47 130.99% 13
Murray 12 0.82 124.10 0 0.00 0.00 NR - - - - -
Nicollet 52 0.96 175.10 40 0.58 133.32 49 0.70 162.35 40 -7.28% 56
Nobles 25 0.78 121.72 10 0.26 48.19 7 0.18 33.53 73 -72.45% 72
Norman 2 1.22 25.57 1 0.37 12.65 NR - - - - -
Olmsted 196 0.93 171.97 315 1.20 273.54 463 1.55 399.67 9 132.40% 12
Otter Tail 64 0.87 120.60 84 0.73 156.66 122 0.91 226.18 30 87.54% 17
Pennington 26 0.39 192.41 39 0.50 285.65 38 0.45 276.69 23 43.80% 31
Pine 8 0.43 34.84 12 0.51 51.72 10 0.39 42.84 68 22.98% 43
Pipestone 6 0.55 57.17 13 1.11 122.61 32 2.15 300.02 20 424.78% 4
Polk 26 0.66 78.83 46 0.94 138.03 54 1.24 161.08 41 104.35% 16
Pope 11 0.35 99.48 19 0.92 170.07 12 0.60 106.78 57 7.33% 52
Ramsey 620 0.66 127.61 649 0.61 132.21 541 1.01 109.55 55 -14.15% 59
Red Lake NR - - 3 0.87 65.62 NR - - - - -
Redwood 31 0.83 179.71 27 0.63 154.91 21 0.53 119.78 51 -33.35% 68
Renville 12 0.69 68.69 22 1.29 124.64 6 0.36 33.79 72 -50.81% 69
Rice 85 0.89 163.25 61 0.57 115.96 81 0.69 153.06 45 -6.24% 55
Rock NR - - 1 0.73 9.93 NR - - - - -
Roseau 21 1.31 133.61 7 0.30 44.08 33 1.53 206.60 34 54.62% 26
Scott 199 1.06 284.03 284 1.35 401.19 537 2.26 754.10 3 165.50% 10
Sherburne 186 0.98 408.09 202 1.44 438.64 227 1.64 490.01 7 20.07% 47
Sibley 5 0.34 33.93 11 0.62 73.89 14 0.64 93.48 60 175.48% 9
St. Louis 504 1.08 252.14 501 0.93 248.07 650 1.06 319.94 17 26.89% 38
Stearns 265 0.83 191.77 237 0.66 169.74 247 0.61 175.86 36 -8.30% 57
Steele 71 1.44 224.07 93 1.58 290.50 125 2.04 388.14 12 73.22% 20
Stevens NR - - 9 0.77 85.01 8 0.51 75.12 63 - -
Swift 4 0.44 37.92 1 0.11 9.38 12 0.82 111.93 54 195.19% 8
Todd 21 0.92 86.88 11 0.53 45.05 25 0.81 101.77 58 17.13% 49
Traverse NR - - 1 0.18 22.64 NR - - - - -
Wabasha 4 0.28 18.95 12 0.58 56.26 21 0.87 97.88 59 416.58% 5
Wadena 4 0.11 30.74 5 0.16 38.03 20 0.37 151.21 46 391.95% 6
Waseca 8 0.55 43.89 10 1.04 54.31 10 0.85 53.99 64 23.00% 41
Washington 441 1.32 251.79 571 1.35 322.66 548 1.35 307.82 19 22.26% 45
Watonwan 34 1.04 292.32 29 0.80 246.79 46 1.50 389.14 11 33.12% 35
Wilkin 11 0.40 147.28 25 1.04 331.30 17 0.60 223.98 33 52.08% 27
Winona 134 0.79 275.24 120 0.70 243.96 111 0.58 224.32 31 -18.50% 60
Wright 192 1.07 249.21 245 1.23 314.74 287 1.26 366.50 15 47.06% 30
Yellow Medicine 3 0.31 24.04 4 0.64 31.73 NR - - - - -

Notes:

NR:None Reported.

TL: Total Marijuana Arrests Reported.

AQ: Arrest Quotient. This indicator compares local marijuana arrests to national marijuana arrests in proportion to all arrests. The AQ is produced through dividing the local percentage of marijuana arrests by the national percentage. A value of 1.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are the same percentage of all arrests as the are nationally. A value of 2.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are twice the percentage of local arrests as they are nationally. AQ values less than 1.0 indicate that local marijuana arrests are less of a percentage of all local arrests than the national standard. A value of .5 indicates that local marijuana arrests are one half the percentage they represent of all national arrests.

RATE: Marijuana arrest rate per 100,000 population.

CHANGE: Percent change in arrest rate from 1995 to 1997.

Citation: Gettman, Jon B. (2000) "US Marijuana Arrests. Part One – County Level Data" Washington, D.C.: National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

Original Data Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest And Offense Data, [Computer files]. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1999.