Loading
Donate

Missouri Arrests

State Arrest Report PDF Marijuana Arrests By County 1995 - 1997

1995

1996

1997

1995 to 1997

NAME

TL

AQ



RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


RANK


CHANGE


RANK
Missouri 12,602 0.91 236.70 13,060 0.87 243.70 14,538 0.88 269.12 - 13.70% -
Adair 47 0.91 189.20 34 0.71 135.98 36 0.63 142.84 98 -24.50% 95
Andrew 21 1.15 138.58 27 1.09 177.01 26 1.00 169.12 90 22.04% 56
Atchison 11 2.36 152.08 6 0.79 82.42 4 0.32 54.51 112 -64.16% 107
Audrain 56 0.87 235.43 52 0.73 217.20 60 0.79 248.63 29 5.61% 76
Barry 49 1.51 150.31 51 1.55 155.43 58 1.31 175.36 89 16.67% 67
Barton 13 0.46 110.29 23 0.80 193.86 13 0.39 108.71 103 -1.43% 82
Bates 34 1.39 220.49 31 1.24 199.73 38 1.29 242.90 33 10.16% 74
Benton 25 1.76 163.77 66 1.71 429.58 18 1.09 116.23 101 -29.03% 97
Bollinger 12 1.59 106.64 15 1.42 132.44 23 1.55 201.47 71 88.93% 18
Boone 278 0.77 226.87 408 0.97 330.80 428 1.08 344.25 11 51.74% 30
Buchanan 79 0.43 94.40 252 0.95 299.16 90 0.32 105.99 104 12.28% 73
Butler 151 1.17 372.39 168 1.27 411.62 140 1.12 340.29 12 -8.62% 90
Caldwell 3 1.88 34.40 11 1.34 125.30 18 1.56 203.41 65 491.39% 3
Callaway 93 1.40 266.69 101 1.42 287.75 118 1.48 333.52 14 25.06% 52
Camden 55 1.21 178.22 69 1.26 222.13 68 1.11 217.18 43 21.86% 57
Cape Girardeau 168 0.82 258.19 38 0.17 58.02 199 0.96 301.43 19 16.75% 66
Carroll 19 1.11 179.65 22 1.05 206.69 28 1.16 260.97 25 45.27% 32
Carter 10 1.78 166.58 NR - - 13 1.64 213.46 46 28.14% 44
Cass 105 0.59 146.70 145 0.68 201.26 226 0.99 311.21 18 112.15% 14
Cedar 21 1.78 165.92 17 1.43 133.44 13 0.55 101.23 107 -38.99% 101
Chariton 2 0.72 22.43 12 1.43 133.73 18 1.53 199.03 80 787.16% 1
Christian 24 1.19 58.62 45 1.29 109.19 42 1.16 101.10 108 72.48% 20
Clark 12 1.73 160.84 9 1.29 119.84 15 1.52 198.15 83 23.20% 55
Clay 329 1.09 350.93 352 1.07 373.04 389 1.16 409.00 6 16.55% 68
Clinton 22 1.17 145.98 21 1.10 138.44 21 1.05 137.35 99 -5.91% 87
Cole 111 1.54 164.13 125 1.34 183.62 163 1.38 237.54 35 44.73% 33
Cooper 19 0.40 120.14 43 0.77 270.13 39 0.52 243.07 32 102.32% 15
Crawford 36 2.00 182.09 26 1.40 130.66 40 1.53 199.42 78 9.52% 75
Dade 13 1.77 164.16 11 1.48 138.00 16 1.53 199.15 79 21.32% 59
Dallas 15 2.93 104.48 19 1.41 131.48 30 1.58 205.96 56 97.13% 17
Daviess 24 4.77 310.04 21 2.84 269.54 44 2.52 560.30 3 80.72% 19
De Kalb 34 1.59 266.50 35 1.39 272.56 11 0.63 84.99 109 -68.11% 108
Dent 31 1.19 220.36 31 1.05 218.94 50 1.57 350.36 9 59.00% 28
Douglas 24 1.29 196.46 16 1.39 130.12 25 1.55 201.71 70 2.67% 78
Dunklin 35 0.61 105.48 111 1.53 332.36 112 1.25 332.70 15 215.41% 5
Franklin 176 1.37 200.50 184 1.30 208.25 181 1.16 203.23 66 1.36% 80
Gasconade 28 1.41 193.18 25 1.20 171.37 34 1.32 231.23 36 19.69% 61
Gentry 11 1.70 158.78 NR - - NR - - - - -
Greene 369 0.78 164.46 535 1.09 236.89 506 0.94 222.27 40 35.15% 36
Grundy 9 0.49 86.02 53 1.57 503.32 36 1.09 339.17 13 294.31% 4
Harrison NR - - 11 1.39 129.79 17 1.53 199.02 81 - -
Henry 27 0.74 128.92 31 0.78 147.06 31 0.77 145.90 96 13.17% 72
Hickory 13 1.72 160.20 11 1.44 134.67 17 1.58 206.49 53 28.89% 42
Holt 5 1.20 87.32 15 2.43 260.28 12 1.58 206.58 52 136.57% 11
Howard 17 1.46 175.47 19 1.84 194.85 28 2.44 284.90 20 62.36% 26
Howell 71 1.44 208.02 74 1.42 215.40 94 1.44 271.45 23 30.49% 39
Iron 29 2.10 262.85 17 1.19 153.10 22 1.29 196.59 85 -25.21% 96
Jackson 3,354 0.73 454.55 3,506 0.71 472.05 4,026 0.73 537.76 4 18.31% 64
Jasper 280 1.03 282.51 373 1.19 373.89 379 1.14 376.90 7 33.41% 38
Jefferson 235 1.02 126.93 287 1.12 154.00 214 0.92 113.92 102 -10.25% 91
Johnson 110 1.25 236.07 72 0.82 153.51 109 1.03 230.56 37 -2.33% 84
Knox 7 1.71 159.60 6 1.45 135.93 9 1.55 202.29 69 26.75% 47
Laclede 79 0.99 273.06 71 1.00 243.82 108 1.09 367.94 8 34.74% 37
Lafayette 71 1.74 220.33 32 0.99 98.66 44 1.39 134.59 100 -38.92% 100
Lawrence 66 1.52 222.85 52 1.15 174.43 206 3.11 685.55 2 207.63% 7
Lewis 18 1.83 175.73 13 1.39 126.10 36 4.97 346.49 10 97.17% 16
Lincoln 35 1.23 109.17 35 1.28 108.46 33 1.17 101.45 106 -7.07% 89
Linn 55 3.07 390.32 42 1.77 296.13 23 0.97 160.90 93 -58.78% 105
Livingston 76 1.74 522.05 37 1.02 252.51 30 0.83 203.13 67 -61.09% 106
Macon 33 1.24 217.02 31 1.09 202.56 39 1.17 252.82 28 16.50% 69
Madison 19 1.79 166.51 15 1.40 130.61 23 1.53 198.67 82 19.32% 62
Maries 13 1.66 155.00 11 1.40 130.30 17 1.54 199.79 77 28.89% 43
Marion 134 1.09 473.35 142 1.07 498.35 94 0.75 327.29 16 -30.86% 98
McDonald 27 1.21 147.47 25 1.45 135.66 38 1.57 204.57 58 38.72% 34
Mercer NR - - 5 1.34 124.10 NR - - - - -
Miller 42 1.35 190.84 39 1.13 176.06 71 1.51 318.00 17 66.63% 22
Mississippi 30 1.22 211.86 43 1.19 301.71 70 1.60 487.26 5 129.99% 12
Moniteau 26 1.29 202.57 24 1.13 185.77 27 1.24 207.34 49 2.35% 79
Monroe 11 6.72 124.43 NR - - 2 1.02 22.30 113 -82.08% 109
Montgomery 6 4.58 51.76 11 1.16 94.27 19 1.64 161.56 92 212.17% 6
Morgan 12 0.47 71.15 22 1.39 129.60 35 1.57 204.55 59 187.47% 8
New Madrid 39 1.43 186.02 34 1.20 161.12 47 1.31 220.96 41 18.78% 63
Newton 105 1.34 239.39 96 1.28 217.45 88 1.23 197.74 84 -17.40% 92
Nodaway 20 0.75 94.01 25 0.67 116.75 32 0.79 148.25 95 57.70% 29
Oregon 41 12.07 412.43 14 1.50 139.92 21 1.60 208.21 48 -49.52% 103
Osage 19 1.66 154.36 17 1.47 137.22 25 1.54 200.19 75 29.69% 40
Ozark 6 1.38 64.45 10 2.23 106.72 10 2.11 105.88 105 64.27% 23
Pemiscot 75 4.86 344.56 29 1.42 132.36 45 1.57 203.76 63 -40.86% 102
Perry 23 1.18 132.07 48 2.02 273.83 38 1.74 215.07 45 62.84% 25
Pettis 70 0.90 189.77 68 0.81 183.15 82 0.86 219.11 42 15.46% 70
Phelps 71 1.47 190.30 45 0.98 119.83 93 1.40 245.69 31 29.11% 41
Pike 36 1.66 222.06 22 0.97 134.83 42 1.10 255.37 27 15.00% 71
Platte 106 1.12 266.14 73 0.74 182.09 100 0.89 247.48 30 -7.01% 88
Polk 43 1.79 178.96 34 1.02 140.58 59 1.46 242.02 34 35.24% 35
Pulaski 32 0.66 79.71 16 0.37 39.59 26 0.48 63.83 110 -19.91% 93
Putnam 8 1.69 156.99 6 1.25 116.98 10 1.48 193.42 88 23.21% 54
Ralls 14 1.74 161.81 11 1.35 126.32 17 1.49 193.69 87 19.70% 60
Randolph 42 1.16 173.42 25 0.67 102.56 53 0.73 215.69 44 24.38% 53
Ray 64 1.87 290.72 46 1.55 207.60 32 0.92 143.27 97 -50.72% 104
Reynolds 11 1.77 165.04 9 1.44 134.17 14 1.59 207.07 50 25.47% 51
Ripley 17 1.86 127.06 12 1.53 89.11 28 1.59 206.26 55 62.34% 27
Saline 19 0.84 82.67 28 0.86 121.04 167 1.65 716.25 1 766.36% 2
Schuyler 7 1.75 162.79 2 1.17 46.21 9 1.59 206.33 54 26.74% 48
Scotland NR - - 6 1.32 123.43 10 1.57 204.12 60 - -
Scott 121 1.42 299.08 102 1.10 250.49 94 0.94 229.02 38 -23.43% 94
Shannon 13 1.74 161.61 11 1.45 135.87 16 1.51 196.08 86 21.33% 58
Shelby 5 2.11 72.48 9 1.39 129.63 14 1.54 200.06 76 176.00% 9
St. Charles 667 1.33 276.34 641 1.26 263.84 673 1.22 274.81 22 -0.55% 81
St. Clair 15 2.91 170.32 5 0.99 56.41 18 1.55 201.46 72 18.28% 65
St. Francois 196 1.84 375.13 103 1.36 195.85 136 1.48 256.55 26 -31.61% 99
St. Louis 2,225 1.01 219.47 2,260 0.97 221.47 2,129 0.89 206.98 51 -5.69% 86
St. Louis (Ind City) 656 0.45 176.62 593 0.38 158.54 633 0.37 167.81 91 -4.99% 85
Ste. Genevieve 17 1.50 102.51 19 1.47 113.83 26 1.52 154.53 94 50.75% 31
Stoddard 47 1.71 159.46 39 1.41 131.46 61 1.57 203.99 61 27.92% 46
Stone 23 1.04 95.11 32 1.41 131.47 50 1.57 203.78 62 114.26% 13
Sullivan NR - - 9 1.48 138.31 14 1.64 213.45 47 - -
Taney 86 1.38 274.71 78 1.18 247.53 86 1.04 270.76 24 -1.44% 83
Texas 36 1.74 161.66 29 1.39 129.38 46 1.56 203.59 64 25.94% 49
Vernon 32 0.49 165.85 11 0.16 56.64 55 0.68 280.97 21 69.42% 21
Warren 43 1.20 195.18 42 1.06 189.40 45 1.10 201.32 73 3.15% 77
Washington 19 0.97 87.69 67 1.41 307.21 49 1.37 222.90 39 154.19% 10
Wayne 20 3.17 157.08 17 1.42 132.66 26 1.55 201.29 74 28.14% 45
Webster 9 0.74 34.36 9 0.62 34.14 15 0.86 56.44 111 64.26% 24
Worth NR - - 3 1.34 124.02 5 1.58 205.09 57 - -
Wright 29 1.73 160.97 23 1.36 126.83 37 1.56 202.42 68 25.75% 50

Notes:

NR:None Reported.

TL: Total Marijuana Arrests Reported.

AQ: Arrest Quotient. This indicator compares local marijuana arrests to national marijuana arrests in proportion to all arrests. The AQ is produced through dividing the local percentage of marijuana arrests by the national percentage. A value of 1.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are the same percentage of all arrests as the are nationally. A value of 2.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are twice the percentage of local arrests as they are nationally. AQ values less than 1.0 indicate that local marijuana arrests are less of a percentage of all local arrests than the national standard. A value of .5 indicates that local marijuana arrests are one half the percentage they represent of all national arrests.

RATE: Marijuana arrest rate per 100,000 population.

CHANGE: Percent change in arrest rate from 1995 to 1997.

Citation: Gettman, Jon B. (2000) "US Marijuana Arrests. Part One – County Level Data" Washington, D.C.: National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

Original Data Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest And Offense Data, [Computer files]. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1999.