Loading
Donate

Nebraska Arrests

State Arrest Report PDF Marijuana Arrests By County 1995 - 1997

1995

1996

1997

1995 to 1997

NAME

TL

AQ



RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


RANK


CHANGE


RANK
Nebraska 4,984 1.34 304.46 5,218 1.29 315.86 6,367 1.38 384.25 - 26.21% -
Adams 23 0.39 76.88 29 0.45 96.06 35 0.48 115.59 40 50.35% 24
Antelope 2 0.58 26.03 1 0.32 12.90 2 0.37 25.73 66 -1.18% 39
Arthur NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -
Banner 1 2.44 115.34 NR - - 1 1.66 114.16 41 -1.03% 37
Blaine 1 24.44 148.59 NR - - NR - - - - -
Boone NR - - 3 0.63 45.28 6 1.09 90.29 45 - -
Box Butte 9 0.24 69.22 22 0.46 167.68 16 0.40 121.59 37 75.66% 18
Boyd NR - - 0 0.00 0.00 NR - - - - -
Brown 4 1.11 109.41 7 1.75 189.80 1 0.35 27.04 65 -75.28% 59
Buffalo 48 0.57 120.82 67 0.82 167.12 103 1.03 256.15 23 112.01% 13
Burt 10 1.20 125.63 8 0.70 99.61 28 1.96 347.65 11 176.73% 9
Butler 19 2.36 219.91 7 0.72 80.29 7 0.86 80.06 46 -63.59% 58
Cass 46 1.17 203.03 48 1.21 209.95 48 0.80 209.32 26 3.10% 36
Cedar 5 0.39 49.32 9 0.83 87.98 NR - - 72 -100.00% 65
Chase 3 0.98 70.37 2 0.42 46.50 5 1.28 115.93 39 64.73% 21
Cherry 4 2.17 62.30 4 1.18 61.74 23 1.41 354.01 9 468.27% 3
Cheyenne 50 2.02 517.87 35 1.41 359.27 50 1.87 511.77 5 -1.18% 38
Clay NR - - 2 0.39 27.16 3 0.36 40.62 60 - -
Colfax 16 0.86 161.21 18 0.60 179.73 10 0.39 99.56 43 -38.24% 52
Cuming 5 0.63 49.14 2 0.30 19.48 3 0.34 29.13 62 -40.71% 54
Custer 11 1.67 87.92 2 0.28 15.84 8 0.62 63.18 53 -28.14% 50
Dakota 49 1.01 272.54 57 1.24 314.17 53 1.10 291.26 17 6.87% 33
Dawes 13 0.68 141.47 15 0.84 161.78 20 1.12 215.08 25 52.03% 23
Dawson 38 0.52 167.60 50 0.62 218.54 35 0.40 152.53 32 -8.99% 46
Deuel 9 4.40 424.73 10 5.05 467.73 17 6.10 792.91 1 86.69% 16
Dixon 8 0.69 127.11 3 0.43 47.24 5 0.59 78.49 47 -38.25% 53
Dodge 97 1.52 278.22 129 1.81 366.65 109 1.49 308.88 15 11.02% 32
Douglas 2,486 2.07 572.68 2,517 1.90 575.44 3,378 2.10 769.82 2 34.42% 25
Dundy 7 3.23 275.59 NR - - 0 0.00 0.00 - - -
Fillmore 9 1.90 129.65 7 1.17 99.94 2 0.51 28.47 63 -78.04% 62
Franklin 1 0.32 26.25 0 0.00 0.00 NR - - - - -
Frontier 1 0.36 31.55 7 2.15 218.82 NR - - - - -
Furnas 9 1.38 157.48 11 1.89 190.74 8 1.52 138.31 34 -12.17% 48
Gage 17 0.49 73.82 32 0.75 137.71 16 0.33 68.65 51 -7.00% 44
Garden 5 1.82 215.24 NR - - 3 0.86 127.61 35 -40.71% 55
Garfield NR - - NR - - 2 2.15 75.13 48 - -
Gosper 3 0.75 144.44 2 0.69 95.42 4 0.97 190.30 29 31.75% 27
Grant NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -
Greeley NR - - 1 2.52 32.54 1 2.15 32.45 61 - -
Hall 228 0.85 445.90 180 0.67 348.84 241 0.85 465.66 6 4.43% 34
Hamilton 14 1.33 151.76 47 4.38 504.94 61 3.63 653.45 4 330.58% 6
Harlan 4 1.24 105.74 2 0.71 52.40 10 1.81 261.23 20 147.06% 11
Hayes NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -
Hitchcock 6 4.73 172.41 NR - - NR - - - - -
Holt 5 0.39 39.87 13 0.97 102.73 6 0.43 47.27 58 18.57% 29
Hooker 1 24.44 136.43 NR - - NR - - - - -
Howard 3 0.66 47.47 2 0.57 31.36 3 0.85 46.90 59 -1.19% 41
Jefferson 1 0.08 11.55 17 1.36 194.66 5 0.46 57.09 55 394.12% 4
Johnson 3 0.56 64.25 6 1.34 127.36 3 0.69 63.49 52 -1.19% 40
Kearney 7 1.13 105.77 5 0.84 74.87 1 0.17 14.93 70 -85.88% 64
Keith 42 2.76 491.17 53 2.66 614.28 57 2.49 658.73 3 34.11% 26
Keya Paha NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -
Kimball 13 1.45 317.31 7 1.05 169.33 12 1.68 289.51 18 -8.76% 45
Knox 1 0.10 10.42 4 0.53 41.31 1 0.10 10.30 71 -1.19% 43
Lancaster 847 1.22 371.99 802 1.05 349.03 888 1.10 385.29 8 3.58% 35
Lincoln 107 0.92 318.53 105 0.98 309.74 96 0.78 282.34 19 -11.36% 47
Logan 1 6.11 111.73 2 1.98 221.48 NR - - - - -
Loup NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -
Madison 44 0.59 128.72 48 0.55 139.15 69 0.71 199.44 27 54.94% 22
McPherson NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -
Merrick 2 0.22 24.41 9 0.79 108.85 16 1.13 192.96 28 690.45% 1
Morrill 1 0.18 18.55 4 0.46 73.54 3 0.45 55.00 56 196.43% 8
Nance NR - - 1 0.49 22.98 1 0.58 22.91 67 - -
Nemaha 15 2.56 191.60 9 0.98 113.94 27 2.02 340.82 12 77.89% 17
Nuckolls NR - - 1 0.27 17.64 3 0.87 52.77 57 - -
Otoe 25 1.06 172.38 38 1.66 259.65 44 1.37 299.77 16 73.90% 19
Pawnee NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -
Perkins NR - - NR - - 4 0.86 120.74 38 - -
Phelps 4 0.36 40.19 5 0.50 49.79 10 0.75 99.28 44 147.02% 12
Pierce 4 0.90 50.65 8 1.54 100.41 8 1.13 100.14 42 97.70% 15
Platte 28 0.53 90.52 49 0.82 156.97 48 0.69 153.31 31 69.37% 20
Polk 5 1.39 89.24 1 0.26 17.69 1 0.24 17.63 69 -80.24% 63
Red Willow 8 0.41 69.75 13 0.54 112.33 52 1.44 448.01 7 542.27% 2
Richardson 12 0.95 122.04 1 0.09 10.08 7 0.54 70.34 50 -42.36% 56
Rock 1 1.16 51.36 2 1.82 101.83 3 1.08 152.36 33 196.65% 7
Saline 13 0.59 99.93 47 1.53 358.04 34 1.27 258.26 21 158.44% 10
Sarpy 299 1.33 271.46 308 1.28 277.10 355 1.32 318.42 13 17.30% 30
Saunders 13 0.65 68.91 42 1.38 220.62 60 2.01 314.25 14 356.03% 5
Scotts Bluff 67 0.69 179.80 69 0.70 183.50 86 0.83 228.03 24 26.82% 28
Seward 37 1.92 228.59 34 1.21 208.17 42 1.22 256.39 22 12.16% 31
Sheridan 5 0.18 74.34 5 0.21 73.67 5 0.18 73.45 49 -1.19% 42
Sherman NR - - 2 0.93 54.42 NR - - - - -
Sioux NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -
Stanton 20 1.48 322.58 29 2.00 463.56 8 0.55 127.51 36 -60.47% 57
Thayer 6 1.51 91.01 13 3.01 195.40 4 0.44 59.94 54 -34.13% 51
Thomas NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -
Thurston 8 1.23 110.18 2 0.52 27.30 2 0.38 27.21 64 -75.30% 61
Valley 3 1.71 60.72 4 1.42 80.22 NR - - - - -
Washington 29 1.41 164.82 64 1.96 360.46 62 1.73 348.18 10 111.25% 14
Wayne 8 1.05 82.94 11 1.10 113.02 2 0.13 20.49 68 -75.29% 60
Webster 2 1.16 47.33 1 0.26 23.45 NR - - - - -
Wheeler NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -
York 33 1.03 224.47 46 1.27 310.08 25 0.64 168.02 30 -25.15% 49

Notes:

NR:None Reported.

TL: Total Marijuana Arrests Reported.

AQ: Arrest Quotient. This indicator compares local marijuana arrests to national marijuana arrests in proportion to all arrests. The AQ is produced through dividing the local percentage of marijuana arrests by the national percentage. A value of 1.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are the same percentage of all arrests as the are nationally. A value of 2.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are twice the percentage of local arrests as they are nationally. AQ values less than 1.0 indicate that local marijuana arrests are less of a percentage of all local arrests than the national standard. A value of .5 indicates that local marijuana arrests are one half the percentage they represent of all national arrests.

RATE: Marijuana arrest rate per 100,000 population.

CHANGE: Percent change in arrest rate from 1995 to 1997.

Citation: Gettman, Jon B. (2000) "US Marijuana Arrests. Part One – County Level Data" Washington, D.C.: National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

Original Data Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest And Offense Data, [Computer files]. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1999.