In Nevada, a person is guilty of DUI if he or she is found to be (1) driving with a certain level of a prohibited substance or metabolite in blood of urine (per se law), OR (2) driving while under the influence of a controlled substance. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 484.397 (West 2010).
(1) Driving with a certain level of a prohibited substance or metabolite in your blood or urine. Id. § 484.397(3).
This is a per se offense – impairment is not an element of the offense. The mere presence of cannabis metabolites above the threshold constitutes a crime.
| Nevada's DUI Per Se Levels by substance per Id. § 484.397(3): | ||
| Prohibited Substance | Urine | Blood |
(g) Marijuana | 10 ng/ml | 2 ng/ml |
(h) Marijuana metabolite | 15 ng/ml | 5 ng/ml |
The fact that the driver is or has been entitled by Nevada to use marijuana is not a defense for this type of DUI. Id. § 484C.110(2)(c).
(2) Driving while under the influence of a controlled substance. Id. § 484.397(2).
The focus of this subsection is the effect of the substance on the driver, rather than the amount consumed. To successfully prosecute under this subsection state must prove driver was under the influence of a controlled substance to a degree which renders the driver incapable of safely driving or exercising actual physical control of a vehicle. In Cotter v. State, the court held that whether a driver is under the influence will "always be a question of fact, to be considered in the light of such variable circumstances as the individual's resistance to the substance, the amount ingested and the type and time of ingestion. Cotter v. State, 738 P.2d 506(1987).
The fact that the driver is or has been entitled by Nevada to use marijuana is not a defense for this type of DUI. Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 484C.110(2)(c) (West 2010).
In Nevada, sobriety checkpoints are authorized by statute.
The police officers in this State may establish roadblocks to warn and protect the traveling public, but administrative roadblocks established by police officers must be established at a point on the highway clearly visible to approaching traffic at a distance of not less than 100 yards in either direction, and display that a sobriety checkpoint is ahead at least ¼ mile before actual checkpoint. Id. § 484B.570.
Cotter v. State, 738 P.2d 506 (1987) -- Holding that aside from per se DUI cases, the state must show more than consumption of a controlled substance and subsequent driving. Furthermore, the State must show impairment as "to a degree which renders him incapable of driving safely or exercising actual physical control of the vehicle."
Sheriff, Clark County v. Burcham, 198 P.3d 326 (2008) -- Holding that aside from per se laws, whether a driver is under the influence will "always be a question of fact, to be considered in the light of such variable circumstances as the individual's resistance to the substance, the amount ingested and the type and time of ingestion.
Nevada has a per se drugged driving law enacted for cannabis, cannabis metabolites, and other controlled substances.
Under Nevada's law, motorists with detectable levels of THC in the blood above 2 ng/ml or detectable
levels of THC-COOH in the urine above 15 ng/ml are guilty of DUID. (Nevada State Code, Section 484.379)