Loading
Donate

Oklahoma Arrests

State Arrest Report PDF Marijuana Arrests By Rate 1995 - 1997

1995

1996

1997

1995 to 1997



NAME


TL


AQ


RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


RANK


CHANGE


RANK
Oklahoma 8,426 1.34 257.05 8,709 1.29 263.83 10,127 1.37 305.31 - 18.77% -
Coal 25 1.90 418.55 28 2.55 465.58 58 2.80 959.95 1 129.35% 5
Texas 103 1.92 630.78 126 2.08 766.33 147 2.30 889.83 2 41.07% 23
Garvin 129 1.83 479.50 145 1.80 535.29 233 3.39 856.15 3 78.55% 12
Atoka 62 3.17 469.20 38 1.94 285.61 98 3.35 733.09 4 56.24% 19
Marshall 31 1.10 266.87 46 1.67 393.30 84 1.62 714.83 5 167.85% 3
Roger Mills 8 2.64 205.55 10 2.16 255.17 28 7.63 711.02 6 245.91% 1
Bryan 188 1.98 561.46 127 1.53 376.65 229 2.00 675.92 7 20.38% 36
Craig 40 1.92 280.07 62 2.61 431.09 90 3.01 622.79 8 122.37% 6
Murray 68 2.14 560.69 127 3.79 1040.05 74 2.59 603.15 9 7.57% 47
Haskell 23 1.06 208.33 36 1.38 323.86 65 1.93 581.97 10 179.34% 2
Pawnee 51 1.83 320.35 71 2.47 442.92 92 2.55 571.22 11 78.31% 13
Mayes 81 1.30 227.19 210 1.92 584.94 201 2.26 557.22 12 145.27% 4
Carter 103 0.93 233.69 135 1.01 304.17 217 1.41 486.60 13 108.23% 7
Ottawa 107 1.71 343.12 97 1.59 308.91 151 2.38 478.59 14 39.48% 25
Sequoyah 211 3.05 594.87 201 2.36 562.76 158 2.15 440.28 15 -25.99% 61
Johnston 30 1.12 295.19 22 0.69 214.99 44 1.31 427.93 16 44.97% 21
Latimer 50 2.36 474.83 29 1.61 273.51 45 1.78 422.42 17 -11.04% 56
Beckham 56 1.28 300.16 87 1.71 463.14 79 1.60 418.57 18 39.45% 26
Cimarron 14 3.20 448.43 1 0.23 31.83 13 2.17 411.91 19 -8.14% 53
Muskogee 217 1.13 312.41 273 1.37 390.31 288 1.21 409.78 20 31.17% 30
Stephens 121 1.14 278.58 135 1.12 308.66 178 1.46 405.02 21 45.39% 20
Okfuskee 51 1.83 452.93 18 0.64 158.76 45 1.26 395.01 22 -12.79% 57
Choctaw 33 1.02 210.31 44 1.41 278.48 61 1.61 384.23 23 82.69% 10
Creek 151 1.56 235.73 162 1.65 251.15 244 1.83 376.47 24 59.70% 17
Caddo 62 1.04 206.97 99 1.57 328.21 114 1.47 376.14 25 81.74% 11
Hughes 58 2.33 449.13 32 1.26 246.10 49 2.08 375.05 26 -16.49% 59
Pontotoc 112 1.33 324.10 117 1.39 336.23 129 1.44 368.94 27 13.83% 41
Alfalfa 25 5.01 401.67 28 4.71 446.78 23 4.85 365.31 28 -9.05% 55
Osage 70 1.27 201.92 89 1.36 254.96 126 1.57 359.24 29 77.91% 14
Cleveland 419 1.27 279.45 405 1.24 268.23 535 1.45 352.63 30 26.19% 32
Jefferson 21 2.30 298.47 26 2.49 367.02 25 3.38 351.27 31 17.69% 37
Canadian 185 1.45 268.61 137 0.85 197.54 239 1.23 342.96 32 27.68% 31
Le Flore 114 1.29 252.07 155 1.47 340.37 156 1.52 340.94 33 35.25% 29
Tulsa 1,556 1.34 290.32 1,614 1.29 299.04 1,846 1.33 340.38 34 17.25% 38
Custer 66 1.26 246.66 83 1.34 308.03 92 1.37 339.82 35 37.77% 27
Cherokee 133 1.27 362.22 155 1.33 419.21 123 1.10 331.06 36 -8.60% 54
Seminole 75 0.96 301.77 67 0.86 267.74 82 1.04 326.13 37 8.07% 46
McClain 112 2.67 453.61 176 3.22 707.91 76 1.77 304.24 38 -32.93% 66
Blaine 47 2.58 421.98 34 1.71 303.17 33 0.91 292.89 39 -30.59% 63
Rogers 150 1.89 245.66 134 1.63 217.94 175 1.76 283.26 40 15.31% 40
Dewey 14 1.28 264.45 5 0.44 93.79 15 1.40 280.11 41 5.92% 48
Wagoner 89 1.45 171.46 153 2.10 292.70 147 1.90 279.87 42 63.23% 16
Lincoln 144 2.89 476.00 72 1.90 236.35 85 1.56 277.71 43 -41.66% 70
Payne 180 1.36 280.75 185 1.48 286.55 178 1.31 274.39 44 -2.26% 49
Delaware 85 2.43 270.07 72 1.50 227.18 80 1.67 251.21 45 -6.98% 52
Adair 39 0.93 196.13 41 0.95 204.76 49 1.08 243.55 46 24.18% 34
Okmulgee 96 0.99 255.49 105 0.98 277.51 92 0.93 242.00 47 -5.28% 50
Pittsburg 74 0.93 171.55 131 1.23 301.59 105 1.17 240.58 48 40.24% 24
Cotton 24 1.83 355.40 16 1.24 235.33 16 1.30 234.23 49 -34.09% 67
Noble 34 3.08 299.90 26 1.82 227.77 26 1.80 226.68 50 -24.42% 60
Grady 77 1.02 177.76 86 1.17 197.16 98 1.24 223.60 51 25.79% 33
Oklahoma 1,345 1.23 198.08 1,202 1.03 175.75 1,510 1.24 219.68 52 10.91% 44
Kay 151 1.08 312.88 90 0.59 185.19 107 0.58 219.11 53 -29.97% 62
Jackson 40 1.14 136.86 32 0.67 108.73 64 1.09 216.41 54 58.13% 18
Logan 55 2.59 183.27 54 1.66 178.70 63 1.61 207.48 55 13.21% 42
McCurtain 61 0.70 178.48 93 0.97 270.24 69 0.73 199.55 56 11.80% 43
Kiowa 18 0.48 161.35 18 0.53 160.24 22 0.75 194.95 57 20.83% 35
Comanche 160 0.86 135.20 131 0.71 109.92 223 0.91 186.22 58 37.74% 28
Greer 7 1.01 107.81 6 0.73 91.79 12 1.30 182.70 59 69.47% 15
McIntosh 70 2.50 384.98 33 1.75 180.24 33 1.50 179.38 60 -53.41% 71
Washington 74 1.07 154.40 107 1.34 221.71 81 1.05 167.03 61 8.18% 45
Woodward 48 0.98 253.95 65 1.14 341.51 31 0.55 162.10 62 -36.17% 69
Garfield 97 0.83 169.35 105 0.87 182.04 92 0.75 158.74 63 -6.26% 51
Harper 15 6.11 390.32 8 3.19 206.77 6 2.23 154.40 64 -60.44% 74
Washita 41 2.64 352.63 15 1.38 128.12 18 1.20 153.01 65 -56.61% 72
Love 28 1.69 324.11 12 1.08 137.95 12 1.14 137.28 66 -57.64% 73
Woods 6 0.81 68.85 8 0.91 91.19 12 0.95 136.15 67 97.73% 8
Nowata 9 0.76 91.07 22 1.47 221.06 13 0.81 130.01 68 42.77% 22
Pushmataha 16 0.95 140.68 7 0.39 61.13 14 0.71 121.68 69 -13.51% 58
Pottawatomie 105 0.77 171.33 132 1.26 213.89 73 0.69 117.73 70 -31.29% 65
Beaver 6 0.76 101.49 37 4.10 621.54 7 0.75 117.04 71 15.32% 39
Major 21 1.84 270.06 13 1.56 166.03 7 0.75 88.98 72 -67.05% 75
Kingfisher 15 0.87 112.27 25 1.81 185.82 10 0.50 73.98 73 -34.11% 68
Grant 2 1.19 35.76 3 1.22 53.27 4 1.41 70.68 74 97.67% 9
Tillman 10 0.80 100.73 14 0.93 140.04 7 0.45 69.69 75 -30.81% 64
Harmon 11 1.66 303.87 4 0.66 109.74 1 0.16 27.31 76 -91.01% 76
Ellis 1 0.53 23.27 NR - - NR - - - - -

Notes:

NR:None Reported.

TL: Total Marijuana Arrests Reported.

AQ: Arrest Quotient. This indicator compares local marijuana arrests to national marijuana arrests in proportion to all arrests. The AQ is produced through dividing the local percentage of marijuana arrests by the national percentage. A value of 1.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are the same percentage of all arrests as the are nationally. A value of 2.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are twice the percentage of local arrests as they are nationally. AQ values less than 1.0 indicate that local marijuana arrests are less of a percentage of all local arrests than the national standard. A value of .5 indicates that local marijuana arrests are one half the percentage they represent of all national arrests.

RATE: Marijuana arrest rate per 100,000 population.

CHANGE: Percent change in arrest rate from 1995 to 1997.

Citation: Gettman, Jon B. (2000) "US Marijuana Arrests. Part One – County Level Data" Washington, D.C.: National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

Original Data Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest And Offense Data, [Computer files]. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1999.