Loading
Donate

Oregon Arrest Rates

State Arrest Report PDF Marijuana Arrests By Rate 1995 - 1997

1995

1996

1997

1995 to 1997



NAME


TL


AQ


RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


RANK


CHANGE


RANK
Oregon 6,146 0.88 195.67 7,061 0.90 220.38 6,186 0.76 190.75 - -2.51% -
Sherman 9 2.39 465.36 19 4.15 963.49 8 2.00 401.00 1 -13.83% 19
Lane 816 1.05 268.14 1,222 1.34 393.66 1,225 1.21 389.89 2 45.41% 4
Hood River 64 1.49 349.55 85 1.61 455.15 61 1.19 322.73 3 -7.67% 15
Clatsop 162 1.23 452.89 121 0.89 331.64 118 0.89 319.57 4 -29.44% 26
Josephine 151 1.29 213.71 173 1.25 240.03 219 1.39 300.21 5 40.48% 5
Grant 6 0.57 74.28 14 0.92 169.94 25 1.96 299.83 6 303.67% 1
Tillamook 81 1.27 341.35 125 1.69 516.46 68 0.92 277.61 7 -18.67% 22
Columbia 130 1.29 312.45 143 1.28 336.98 114 1.17 265.43 8 -15.05% 20
Jefferson 68 1.08 429.29 69 0.97 427.09 41 0.67 250.75 9 -41.59% 32
Coos 184 1.01 288.19 197 1.09 302.50 165 0.93 250.34 10 -13.13% 18
Douglas 335 1.14 334.83 351 1.11 343.94 257 0.86 248.80 11 -25.69% 25
Linn 241 0.90 241.81 276 0.89 271.49 249 0.82 241.99 12 0.07% 11
Lincoln 119 0.91 270.29 149 1.00 331.79 108 0.78 237.61 13 -12.09% 17
Wasco 53 0.80 230.34 91 1.27 387.73 56 0.67 235.74 14 2.34% 10
Jackson 317 0.74 191.82 373 0.72 221.28 394 0.70 230.93 15 20.39% 8
Deschutes 272 1.16 293.92 327 1.26 346.41 209 0.75 218.75 16 -25.58% 24
Polk 139 1.34 328.10 132 1.15 305.48 95 0.88 217.22 17 -33.79% 29
Curry 92 1.97 434.45 102 2.25 472.24 47 1.13 215.00 18 -50.51% 33
Union 82 1.27 322.94 55 0.87 212.36 55 0.86 209.82 19 -35.03% 30
Wallowa 11 0.71 144.77 5 0.43 64.52 15 1.20 191.25 20 32.10% 7
Lake 17 1.22 227.88 7 0.56 92.00 14 0.84 181.79 21 -20.22% 23
Morrow 8 0.57 90.91 16 0.95 178.25 15 0.75 165.14 22 81.66% 2
Umatilla 129 0.78 200.97 127 0.71 193.98 109 0.57 164.50 23 -18.15% 21
Multnomah 1,033 0.71 165.71 1,048 0.68 164.79 1,056 0.65 164.03 24 -1.02% 12
Marion 391 0.70 145.60 443 0.65 161.73 453 0.64 163.39 25 12.22% 9
Klamath 63 0.52 101.73 113 0.99 178.89 95 0.66 148.59 26 46.06% 3
Baker 17 0.42 102.64 23 0.45 136.14 24 0.47 140.37 27 36.76% 6
Washington 533 0.93 145.86 621 0.95 166.60 525 0.77 139.16 28 -4.60% 14
Crook 33 0.79 203.98 12 0.23 72.72 23 0.36 137.71 29 -32.49% 28
Yamhill 169 1.01 227.72 169 0.91 223.25 104 0.55 135.74 30 -40.39% 31
Malheur 41 0.52 146.91 37 0.46 129.98 39 0.43 135.37 31 -7.86% 16
Harney 25 2.53 347.56 8 0.81 109.05 10 0.99 134.70 32 -61.24% 35
Gilliam 2 0.72 106.21 2 0.42 104.17 2 0.49 102.99 33 -3.04% 13
Benton 110 1.00 145.08 126 0.83 162.92 78 0.53 99.64 34 -31.32% 27
Clackamas 243 0.54 77.20 280 0.51 87.21 110 0.20 33.85 35 -56.15% 34
Wheeler NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -

Notes:

NR:None Reported.

TL: Total Marijuana Arrests Reported.

AQ: Arrest Quotient. This indicator compares local marijuana arrests to national marijuana arrests in proportion to all arrests. The AQ is produced through dividing the local percentage of marijuana arrests by the national percentage. A value of 1.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are the same percentage of all arrests as the are nationally. A value of 2.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are twice the percentage of local arrests as they are nationally. AQ values less than 1.0 indicate that local marijuana arrests are less of a percentage of all local arrests than the national standard. A value of .5 indicates that local marijuana arrests are one half the percentage they represent of all national arrests.

RATE: Marijuana arrest rate per 100,000 population.

CHANGE: Percent change in arrest rate from 1995 to 1997.

Citation: Gettman, Jon B. (2000) "US Marijuana Arrests. Part One – County Level Data" Washington, D.C.: National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

Original Data Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest And Offense Data, [Computer files]. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1999.