Loading
Donate

Oregon Arrests

State Arrest Report PDF Marijuana Arrests By County 1995 - 1997

1995

1996

1997

1995 to 1997

NAME

TL

AQ



RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


TL


AQ


RATE


RANK


CHANGE


RANK
Oregon 6,146 0.88 195.67 7,061 0.90 220.38 6,186 0.76 190.75 - -2.51% -
Baker 17 0.42 102.64 23 0.45 136.14 24 0.47 140.37 27 36.76% 6
Benton 110 1.00 145.08 126 0.83 162.92 78 0.53 99.64 34 -31.32% 27
Clackamas 243 0.54 77.20 280 0.51 87.21 110 0.20 33.85 35 -56.15% 34
Clatsop 162 1.23 452.89 121 0.89 331.64 118 0.89 319.57 4 -29.44% 26
Columbia 130 1.29 312.45 143 1.28 336.98 114 1.17 265.43 8 -15.05% 20
Coos 184 1.01 288.19 197 1.09 302.50 165 0.93 250.34 10 -13.13% 18
Crook 33 0.79 203.98 12 0.23 72.72 23 0.36 137.71 29 -32.49% 28
Curry 92 1.97 434.45 102 2.25 472.24 47 1.13 215.00 18 -50.51% 33
Deschutes 272 1.16 293.92 327 1.26 346.41 209 0.75 218.75 16 -25.58% 24
Douglas 335 1.14 334.83 351 1.11 343.94 257 0.86 248.80 11 -25.69% 25
Gilliam 2 0.72 106.21 2 0.42 104.17 2 0.49 102.99 33 -3.04% 13
Grant 6 0.57 74.28 14 0.92 169.94 25 1.96 299.83 6 303.67% 1
Harney 25 2.53 347.56 8 0.81 109.05 10 0.99 134.70 32 -61.24% 35
Hood River 64 1.49 349.55 85 1.61 455.15 61 1.19 322.73 3 -7.67% 15
Jackson 317 0.74 191.82 373 0.72 221.28 394 0.70 230.93 15 20.39% 8
Jefferson 68 1.08 429.29 69 0.97 427.09 41 0.67 250.75 9 -41.59% 32
Josephine 151 1.29 213.71 173 1.25 240.03 219 1.39 300.21 5 40.48% 5
Klamath 63 0.52 101.73 113 0.99 178.89 95 0.66 148.59 26 46.06% 3
Lake 17 1.22 227.88 7 0.56 92.00 14 0.84 181.79 21 -20.22% 23
Lane 816 1.05 268.14 1,222 1.34 393.66 1,225 1.21 389.89 2 45.41% 4
Lincoln 119 0.91 270.29 149 1.00 331.79 108 0.78 237.61 13 -12.09% 17
Linn 241 0.90 241.81 276 0.89 271.49 249 0.82 241.99 12 0.07% 11
Malheur 41 0.52 146.91 37 0.46 129.98 39 0.43 135.37 31 -7.86% 16
Marion 391 0.70 145.60 443 0.65 161.73 453 0.64 163.39 25 12.22% 9
Morrow 8 0.57 90.91 16 0.95 178.25 15 0.75 165.14 22 81.66% 2
Multnomah 1,033 0.71 165.71 1,048 0.68 164.79 1,056 0.65 164.03 24 -1.02% 12
Polk 139 1.34 328.10 132 1.15 305.48 95 0.88 217.22 17 -33.79% 29
Sherman 9 2.39 465.36 19 4.15 963.49 8 2.00 401.00 1 -13.83% 19
Tillamook 81 1.27 341.35 125 1.69 516.46 68 0.92 277.61 7 -18.67% 22
Umatilla 129 0.78 200.97 127 0.71 193.98 109 0.57 164.50 23 -18.15% 21
Union 82 1.27 322.94 55 0.87 212.36 55 0.86 209.82 19 -35.03% 30
Wallowa 11 0.71 144.77 5 0.43 64.52 15 1.20 191.25 20 32.10% 7
Wasco 53 0.80 230.34 91 1.27 387.73 56 0.67 235.74 14 2.34% 10
Washington 533 0.93 145.86 621 0.95 166.60 525 0.77 139.16 28 -4.60% 14
Wheeler NR - - NR - - NR - - - - -
Yamhill 169 1.01 227.72 169 0.91 223.25 104 0.55 135.74 30 -40.39% 31

Notes:

NR:None Reported.

TL: Total Marijuana Arrests Reported.

AQ: Arrest Quotient. This indicator compares local marijuana arrests to national marijuana arrests in proportion to all arrests. The AQ is produced through dividing the local percentage of marijuana arrests by the national percentage. A value of 1.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are the same percentage of all arrests as the are nationally. A value of 2.0 indicates that local marijuana arrests are twice the percentage of local arrests as they are nationally. AQ values less than 1.0 indicate that local marijuana arrests are less of a percentage of all local arrests than the national standard. A value of .5 indicates that local marijuana arrests are one half the percentage they represent of all national arrests.

RATE: Marijuana arrest rate per 100,000 population.

CHANGE: Percent change in arrest rate from 1995 to 1997.

Citation: Gettman, Jon B. (2000) "US Marijuana Arrests. Part One – County Level Data" Washington, D.C.: National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

Original Data Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest And Offense Data, [Computer files]. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1999.