United States of America v. Kynaston, et al. - USDC in Washington State suppressed a few thousand plants because officers failed to address the medical marijuana statute in their affidavit in support of their search warrant.

• Defendants-Appellees' Response Brief
• Defendants-Appellees' Motion to Strike
• Brief for Appellant
• Supress Order Granting
• United States' Response
• Defendant's Original Suppression Memorandum

Commonwealth of Massachusetts vs. Benjamin Cruz - While the transformation of adult marijuana possession from a misdemeanor to a noncriminal civil infraction limits warrantless police intrusions into otherwise lawful conduct based on merely the odor of marijuana, as a matter of the state constitution's protection against unreasonable search and seizure, thereby requiring the trial court's suppression order in this case; are those limits reinforced by state common law (even as narrowly expanded by G.L.c.94C, sec. 41), and by constitutional protections from unreasonable government interference with individual autonomy and cognitive sovereignty.

• Brief of Amicus Curiae in Support of the Appellee

State of Oregon v. Fred Jonathon Smalley - Whether marijuana which is not criminally possessed is contraband, such that the mere aroma of it creates probable cause to justify the warrantless search of a stopped vehicle.

• NORML amicus curiae brief

United States of America v. Mitchell J. Harrington

• Memorandum in Support of Motion to Supress
• Government's Response to Motion to Supress
• Order Sustaining Motion to Supress
• Operation Pipeline Manual

Bd. of Ed. of Ind. School Dist No. 92 of Pottawatomie County, et al. v. Lindsay Earls, et al. - Drug Tests

• Amicus curiae brief filed by John Wesley Hall on behalf of NORML, NACDL, Common Sense for Drug Policy and the Cato Institute, to the US Supreme Court. February 2002.

People v. Myron Carlyle Mower

• Court of Appeals Decision
• Appellant's brief to the Supreme Court
• CA NORML Amicus Brief

State of Iowa v. Carl Ervin Myers

• Appellee Brief and Notice of Oral Argument filed by Thomas J. O'Flaherty, Esq., to the Iowa Supreme Court, December 3, 1996.
• Appeal

State of Illinois v. Joe Muff - Asserts that evidence discovered during a search should be suppressed because the affidavit for the search warrant was facially defective; contained untrue factual allegations; and was not supported by probable cause. Further, that the police utilized improper tactics in its execution.

• Motion To Suppress filed by NORML Legal Committee member David Stepanich before the Illinois Circuit Court in 1999.

State of Washington v. Steve Thein - Successful appeal from Washington Court of Appeals arguing that the probable cause for a search warrant requires more than generalizations regarding common habits of drug dealers, unsubstantiated rumor and inferences from facts not in the record.

• Petition for Discretionary Review