The Feds Finally Recognize The Anti-Cancer Potential Of Cannabis — 36 Years Too Late!

Scientific trials have for decades documented the anti-cancer properties of cannabis and its constituents. Yet it took until this week for the website of the National Institute of Cancer, a component of the U.S. government’s National Institutes of Health, to finally acknowledged the herb’s therapeutic utility for patients living with disease or suffering from the adverse side-effects of cancer treatment.
In a newly added section to the website, entitled ‘Cannabis and Cannabinoids,’ the Institute states:

Cannabinoids may cause antitumor effects by various mechanisms, including induction of cell death, inhibition of cell growth, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Cannabinoids appear to kill tumor cells but do not affect their nontransformed counterparts and may even protect them from cell death.”
…The potential benefits of medicinal cannabis for people living with cancer include antiemetic effects, appetite stimulation, pain relief, and improved sleep. In the practice of integrative oncology, the health care provider may recommend medicinal cannabis not only for symptom management but also for its possible direct antitumor effect.”

It’s a stunning acknowledgment, given that the NIH is a branch of the very same government that presently maintains that the cannabis plant and all of its naturally-derived components have ‘no accepted medical use.’ Yet it also begs the question: Where has the National Institute of Cancer been all these years?
After all, the anti-tumor activity of cannabinoids were initially documented in 1975! That’s right; it’s taken 36 years for the Institute to get with the program.
Hopefully it won’t take them another 36 years to demand that the Feds finally assess whether these preclinical results are replicable in human trials.

149 thoughts

  1. Awesome news and info that’s probably purposefully been hidden for all these yrs., for God’s sake our Gov’t would never want the masses to be healthy and happy

  2. This should automatically kick Marijuana, THC, etc from Schedule 1 to Schedule 2. Just like Cocaine. Not much difference in consequence, but it’s a start.

  3. Where have the Oncologists been all these years? With their heads up their asses…..they ALL KNEW all of this–they were playing the game—political football. Damn the truth, we want to sell you droperidol as an anti-emetic (a so-called anti-psychotic, like reglan or haloperidol.).
    They and all of organized medicine that has been silent on this for years are cowards. At least now, they begin a step toward the light of the truth.

  4. Well, maybe now their will be no more suffering. I am so excited that this information has come out in public! Lets go and help some sick people!

  5. It’s all about “The Pill.” But – even the pill isn’t as good as the natural whole plant material. Does anyone really believe that they would have come “out of the closet” unless they had something to offer in place of their humongous discovery. But! – it’s all good! Now! if we could only get rid of that tumor they call the DEA. Now that our sacrament [has] current acceptable medical use, and we know [has] no potential for abuse it must, by law, be removed from schedule I. I wonder, though, when they will come clean on the non-addictive, non-toxic, Gateway bull shit? It sure takes them a long time to tell the truth. They have so much egg on their face, one could call them “chicken face” instead of the usual chicken shit.
    Rebel with a Cause
    Los Angeles Colony

  6. so now what ? are they goin to put it on the market or have it medically available? or are they just sayin it prevents cancer cells but they still will not put it out there for people to have? its like tease a child with a new toy that they will never have.

  7. I have told people about how cannabis smoke will not give you cancer and may actually prevent it, but most of them just blew me off. Let them blow this off now.

  8. Why are we only finding out about this now? Has this been covered up for thirty six years? I want to know. How come more studies are not allowed by the US Government? If cannabis can be used to help in the treatment of cancer then let’s start using it. To deny medical treatments for something as serious as cancer in the name of some silly war on drugs is shear lunanacy.

  9. This is the information all of us who have fought cancer or who are fighting it now, need to get to all members of our cancerfighter team. In the medical field paradigm and protocol will only be broken down by us getting the facts to them. They are not going to go out and look for this information, especially with the resistance to it’s authenticity by the federal drug enforcement agencies who are responsible for the regulation of the legality or illegality of the cannabis plant. All shifts in ways of thinking are always met first with full resistance, then belligerent acceptence, and finally wih full acceptance. The times they are a changing !

  10. Def about time.. Let’s keep the ball rolling!
    There is too little time to be so concerned with a “drug” and it’s alleged negatives, which stem practically all the way back to the days of ‘Reefer Madness’.
    I mean, jeez.

  11. uhoh the NIH is going to get a visit from someone and probably get shut down for saying something positive about Marijuana.

  12. Ok now what? I saw last night a cop here telling us that this new type of pot is so dangers that peply are (O-D) ON IT. Then the news caster stated that pot is a gate way Drug. I guess what im saying is that it does note matter how much befitting this plant is The meda will not report it. Until we can get out of our homes and hit the street like in the east we will not see it leagle Am i saying we need to start a war with this goverment. Only if we want to get our heads bash in. So think yall what can we do to make this plant leagl now. NO MORE GAMES. iM a old man. And i am tird of what probtion has done to our country.

  13. Now, we can all go tell the DEA to shove their beliefs up their asses, where their heads have been deeply planted for years, because now a federal medical institution has countered their claim by believing cannabis has medicinal value. Not some random disease with better treatment options – like the FDA has claimed – no, no, its an admission of aid for the big problem, cancer. We win, Game Over!

  14. Some folks at the FDA and DEA need to start packing up personal belongings from their desks. Imagine how stupid they are going to appear once we start seeing some REAL science in action.

  15. This is AWESOME!! Great progress on this rough road. I do ask the question, why are we not pushing for a federal medical bill? Get your prescription from a pain management doctor, have a panel that evaluates the doctors and randomly pull patient records to evaluate and to assure they are qualified, and if they aren’t it’s at the hands of the doctor. Then just set up a plan for each patient 4 plants that they can differ growing their own to a qualified grower which would be sold and taxed. Would this not be the next step instead of all out legalization? If a federal law was enacted for medical, other states would be stupid to allow this because it will create the revenue that it could create for the states/feds. It just seems like when we’re wanting a president to consider marijuana, it’s to all out legalize. Maybe I’m wrong though.

  16. The first part of the Institute’s statement that is quoted is no longer on the page “Cannabis and Cannabinoids.”
    “Cannabinoids may cause antitumor effects by various mechanisms, including induction of cell death, inhibition of cell growth, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Cannabinoids appear to kill tumor cells but do not affect their nontransformed counterparts and may even protect them from cell death.”
    Does anyone have a screenshot of it?
    Possible censorship going on here….
    K

  17. I believe it is a matter for the majority of people to see that the whole cannabis prohibition, the whole DEA “dogma” that “marijuana is a dangerous drug without accepted medical use” be exposed in its anti-scientific, deceptive nature. Cannabis is not physically addictive as it lacks the recognizable “physical withdrawal syndrome” (like opiates, or alcohol, for example); the so-called “gateway drug theory” has been proven to be nonsense by a scientific research, and was even declared “half-baked” by a recent study; drug Marinol, much touted by the DEA, is not at all the same as medicinal cannabis which, as opposed to Marinol, has over 70 active compounds interacting in therapeutic ways. Cannabis decriminalization is followed by a decrease (not an increase) in “teenage use”, as the example of Portugal clearly shows, and (with another major scare-tactic disintegrating), smoking cannabis does not increase one’s risk of lung cancer; combine all this with the violence-suppressing qualities of cannabis use, its propensity to be a “safe alternative” to alcohol/hard drugs, its remarkable medicinal properties, and then see if the DEA “dogmas” have any factual foundation and not just an empty talk that is being enforced by a version of philosophical “radical pragmatism” which basically “allows” its followers to disregard the truth in favor of, let’s say, DEA “dogma”, with such a dogma being constantly “reinforced” by a consciousness of “guilt” and “fear”. “Radical Pragmatism” was at the basis of Illinois patients being denied their medicine, because the DEA intimidated enough “law-makers” with the “non-existing entity” of a “gateway drug theory. The same way, some rogue politicos in Montana are trying to trample the will of Voters of that state by “repealing” the medical marijuana law! So, what we (and I mean, all of us) need to do is spread this scientific knowledge (along with the refutation of “dogma”), so that even for the politicians this becomes a question of either siding with fear and ignorance (which will assure one kind or “legacy”), or with science, progress and compassion, which will bring a totally different “legacy” altogether; I doubt that any of these crooks will enjoy a “legacy” of him remaining silent when the modern-day “storm-troopers” dragged a cancer-afflicted granny to jail for using medicinal cannabis. Let’s not forget to ask our politicians as well as to why they are “crying broke” and yet, at the same time keep financing the so-called “marijuana enforcement” while most of the country wants this rather harmless natural substance decriminalized altogether, and definitely legalized when it comes to its many remarkable medicinal uses.

  18. Disregard my previous comment. I made the assumption that the link would lead to a page with both quotes present. After further investigation I was able to locate the first quote on a different section of the “Cannabis and Cannabinoids” page
    Perhaps a link to the page with the first quote can be provided so as to avoid any further confusion.
    Or it could just be me hehe
    [Paul Armentano responds:
    “Cannabinoids may cause antitumor effects by various mechanisms, including induction of cell death, inhibition of cell growth, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. [9-11] Cannabinoids appear to kill tumor cells but do not affect their nontransformed counterparts and may even protect them from cell death. These compounds have been shown to induce apoptosis in glioma cells in culture and induce regression of glioma tumors in mice and rats. Cannabinoids protect normal glial cells of astroglial and oligodendroglial lineages from apoptosis mediated by the CB1 receptor. [10,11]”
    http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional/page4%5D
    Thank You NORML for sticking up for humans and plants.

  19. Just remember this is the same Government that protects a cancer patients right to continue to smoke tobacco-yet is willing to imprison the same cancer patient for providing themselves with a cigarette that is well documented to actually help them-That’s government working for the people in action! Every citizen out there must know-The Emperor truly wears no clothes-and this lie must end.

  20. Please tell me there’s a way in which this can nullify the schedule I status of cannabis…most likely not, but along with the government’s own patent on cannabinoids as neuroprotectants (http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6630507.html) should prove that it is incorrectly Schedule I when it should be, at the very most, Schedule II.

  21. Paul,
    Thank you for informing the world that the National Cancer Institute has finally acknowledged what researchers have known for almost forty years. Talk about cutting-edge science!!
    Although it is frustrating to know that we’ve known that cannabis possesses potent anti-cancer properties all this time while our government maintained a stony silence, it is heartening to know that at least one federal agency is sick and tired of this flat-earth nonsense, and is angered enough that medical care is sublimated to needless and senseless social control to break ranks with the rest of the reefer madness “drug worriers.”
    Your discovery was BIG NEWS yesterday at Democratic Underground, where the topic made it to the top of the “Greatest” page and stayed there for over 12 hours. Here’s a link to that very long discussion:
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439×730217
    Thanks, as always, for your work. The sunshine of science, common sense and compassion is finally breaking through and not a minute too soon.

  22. Yea for the National Institutes for Health!
    That was ever so very bold of them, eight years After the USA government was awarded US Patent #6630507 relating to the medicinal use of cannabis, one year After the Veterans Administration okayed use of cannabis for the treatment of G.I.s, and months After the DEA opened a Big Pharma-specific loophole in the use of natural extracts of cannabis in Their prescription medications.
    Of course, application of Cannabis Sativa as a natural herbal medicine is far too dangerous a “narcotic” to be allowed to those States that decriminalize cannabis or enact Medical Marijuana programs. Too dangerous, that is, to the bottom line profits of Big Pharma and the Prohibition Prison Industrial Complex. Thank goodness that the USA has a heavily militarized jack-booted Police State LEO in the guise of the DEA to help protect the citizens of this country from themselves, and that deadly cannabis which has never killed a single individual in all of recorded history.
    The same thing could hardly be said of 90% of all the toxic witches brew concoctions that emanate from Big Pharma — most of which could be replaced by harmless cannabis. Somehow, that’s what I think that Big Pharma actually has in mind, long term — replacing their “killer” ingredients. Every public commercial that pushes Big Pharma’s patent medicines reveals disturbing “black label” details that should (Should) dissuade the public from experimenting with their snake oil “curatives”. I know that that is their commercials effects on me.
    Unfortunately, just so long as there are crony corporate special interests that stand to financially benefit from the continuation of the persecution and prohibition of Cannabis Sativa, the goal of having cannabis & hemp fully legalized, like beer or wine or even better like tomato plants, the re-legalization of cannabis and hemp will never occur. Not unlike single payer universal health care in the USA, also doomed. Follow the money.

  23. I wonder how the mass media groups missed this one! (as if it will get reported either way.)
    It seems it’s up to us to spread this news.
    And thus we shall enlighten the masses!
    It appears the information was “modified” on 3/17/2011. I wonder when it was actually added to the site.

  24. Other countries have done the research on cannabis and cancer with information from W.VA University date 1974. The USA government issues med. marijuana it self. Yet they continue to flat out lie and do criminal acts upon it’s own people.

  25. Seems like the whole rescheduling issue needs to be looked at as a botanical vs drug issue.
    Is it really appropriate in a democracy to have a plant made into a controlled substance. Now if it was a purified extract created by chemical extraction we were talking about, then perhaps a government “drug” regulator should be involved… but for a plant?

  26. HA! If it’s got $ signs attached to it they say it works wonders! Got to love Big Pharma!

  27. In a Title 42 USC 1983 it is not necessary to allege or prove that the defendents (Governement) intended to deprive plaintiff (Citizens) of their Constitutional rights or that they acted willfully, purposely, or in prusuance of a conspiracy (Constructive Fraud).
    It is sufficient to establish that the deprivation of constitutional rights or privileges was the natural consequences of the actions of the defendants acting under the color of law, irrespective of the actions whether such consequences was intended. Ury v. Santee (1969 DC Ill.)
    http://www.change.org/petitions/citizens-demand-national-debate-for-the-legalization-of-cannabis#?opt_new=t&opt_fb=t

  28. We’ve been in clinical tests for the past 10,000 years, lol. Cancer soared when the medical mafia and the US drug cartels (DEA/CIA) made it illegal. The data is out there, but I don’t have a PhD. so mainstream won’t look into it.

  29. it need to be designated as prevenative treatment for cancer and whatever else ..or once again someone looking to make money..growers, goverment fda..is going to make it only available to a select few..fuck them retards..its my body..my life i should be able to put anything in my body i feel fit to as long as i’m not infringing on anyone elses rights!! USA is a crap hole to live in and they seem to do nothing but make us hated by the world..take our money..spend it on giving other countries weapons..then tell us what to do with our free time..i work 12 hrs a day, and they skim their take off the top..assholes..then they tell me what i can do with my time..if theirs anyone here from china..call the debt from the usa and nuke the shit out of us..hell it’s terrible when all hope in the world is lost..NORML does a good job bringing awareness to the masses..but what good is awarness when the masses think that MJ should be regulated..taxed..etc..it’s my personal opinion that money will doom weed from being legal, hope we get nuked..life sucks !!

  30. It is about time, the DEA finaly saw the light. Now get it out of schedule 1 and put it in Medical! Where it belongs. Takes this goverment to long to decide what should do. All though 74% of Americans all ready know that cannabis is a great med!!

  31. It has been known for years. I seriously doubt we see any action after the blatant abuse our government hands out on a daily basis ever since the 70’s. It is a freaking plant. For the love of the human race stop arresting and abusing people over it…

  32. Stompedonmyrights declares, and Genesists agree:
    The Constitution is a written document, as such, it’s meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now. So. Carolina v. United States 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905).
    When rights are secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.
    When any court violates the clean and unambiguous language of the Constitution, a FRAUD is perpetrated and no one is bound to obey it. State v. Sutton, Minn. (147, 65 NW 262, 30 L.R.A 630 Am. St. 459).
    Therefore – Compelling Justification, Prior Competing Governmental Interests, and the Government Supremacy Clause absolutely frustrates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. of 1993 H.R. 1308, and is regarded as Constitutionally invalid and voidable. Further – Genesists declare a “Conscience Clause” which prohibs us from obeying any law that denies us our
    Sacrament.

  33. I can’t believe I read this and the comments and the president isn’t on the news yet. Think he will apologize to us? Think Japan would be a good test sight to test hemp oil for the Cure?

  34. Wow how did big ins, and tabacco miss out on this one… How much money would they save from cancer payments? Also boys and girls think of smoking with much less side effects…. Guys come on someone ring the bell already… the FIGHT IS OVER>>>
    Have a nice day… :o)

  35. They’ve always known. They’re just now starting to collapse under the demands of their BOSS. The American public.

  36. Holy Smokes. Michelle Leonhart and Eric Holder must now act to remove the Schedule I status of cannabis (a.k.a. marijuana). These findings are encouraging and need to help fuel the end of this insane prohibition. The DEA is bieng used as the police agency for the world by the United States Government. It’s time to end the schrade. God Bless.
    The Rev.sLeezy

  37. As encouraging as this news sounds at first, I smell a load of BULLSHIT that will follow…
    Anyone here know about U.S. Patent # 6630507 ?
    The only reason they’re admitting to this now is because they’re rolling up their sleeves, getting ready to make money from it. In other words, they’re going to put it in a pill and charge us for it.
    You honestly think you can trust the feds now?!?!?

  38. @51: Holy What?
    Seriously, after this movement, the “other shoe” is to admit Harm Reduction Utensils exist (and can be substituted for the #1 killer which is NOT TOBACCO BUT THE $IGARETTE.
    1. The one thing keeping Big 2WackGo (i.e. $igarette companies) alive today is the failure to popularize vaporizers, e-cigarettes, and little one-hitter pipes worldwide fast enough. Once all hot burning overdose nicotine addicts have switched from $igarettes (which burn at 700-C.) to 25-mg.-per-lightup single toke utensils, those companies will be making 1/15 as much money and won’t have any money left over to bribe Republican politicians to fight for prohibition of cannabis.
    2. The main thing keeping Dosage Reduction Utensils rare and/or de facto illegal is cannabis prohibition– usually coupled with license for any rogue cop to accuse you of lawbreaking (cannabis) because you are found to possess a Harm Reducvtion Utensil. Worse, your parents, if they find one, may panic and disown you as a traitor to their old age security which depends on you getting a high pay drug test job and making a ton of money. So out there across America and much of the world, almost every kiffer is afraid to own a utensil and rolls hot burning THC-destroying carbon monoxide joints instead.
    3. So now it’s time for the NIC to get serious about investigating VAPORIZER et al. as a solution to the “SMOKING”-related alleged cannabis hazards, and when they find cannabis vaporized properly is safe and appropriate, to admit it and take action to promote total replacement of genocidal hot burning overdose paper with Downdosage Revolution Devices.
    4. Any one-hitter, however cheap (see Wikipedia), is a vaporizer. Get instructions “how to make pipes out of everyday objects” (wikiHow) in the hands of handworky tinkerers in every neighborhood. Every humble little piece of wood or metal may then be our best soldier in the War Against Cancer.
    PS. Now nine months since a CANNABINOID E-CIGARETTE was announced in and only for Los Angeles. Any action lately on getting this technology to ALL CANNABIS USERS worldwide? Or does somebody want to “keep cannabis harmful” in order to justify fending off its threat to the tobacco oligarchy?

  39. I think that to systematically thwart the advancement of any medical science is a crime against humanity.

  40. How long do you think the FEDS are going to cover the real truth about marijuana with a ORWELLIAN AND TOTALITARIAN MENTALITY OF REEFER MADNESS. When the real truth comes out about marijuana the BARBARIANS AT THE GATE OF MARIJUANA PROHIBITION are starting to dwindle and trying to circumnavigate our rights around the CONSTITUTION with FEDERAL LAW MENTALITY. It’s not 36 years late but more like when MARIJUANA PROHIBITION has been implemented in our CONSTITION and thousands of years beyond that in earlier cultures. The NIC are starting to come out of denial but BIG PHARMA and the FDA seem to have other plans to corner the market on how marijuana should be ingested and it sounds like more FEDERALISM to me. The NEW WORLD ORDER IS HERE!

  41. Why cant they get with the program, my wife is battling cancer and you would not know how the treatments tear people them up mentally as well as physically,any thing that would ease the pain and suffering I am all for it.Its time for the government to pull their heads out of their butts and realize that it has good effects to those thats suffering eith this illness!!!

  42. I excitedly clicked your link to the “newly added section” of the National Cancer Institute expecting to find this great news, only to be extremely disappointing to find the same old lies published in the very first sentience…
    “Cannabis, also known as marijuana, originated in Central Asia but is grown worldwide today. In the United States, it is a controlled substance and is classified as a Schedule I agent (a drug with increased potential for abuse and no known medical use). ”
    I had to dig for the words that you quoted and disappointed again to find that you left out the beginning…
    Under “Antitumor Effects”
    “One study in mice and rats suggested…..”
    The lengthy 12 paged BS contained the following statements…
    “No clinical trials of Cannabis as a treatment for cancer in humans were identified in a PubMed search.”
    “No published studies have explored the effect of inhaled Cannabis on appetite in cancer patients.”
    “In clinical trials of Cannabis, euphoria is often scored as an adverse effect.[1,2]”
    “At present, there is insufficient evidence to recommend inhaling Cannabis as a treatment for cancer-related symptoms or cancer treatment–related side effects outside the context of well-designed clinical trials.”
    The biased article did state that two synthetic forms of THC “are effective in the treatment of N/V induced by chemotherapy.[9-12]”
    “The researchers reported that patients who used nabilone experienced improved management of pain, nausea, anxiety, and distress when compared with untreated patients. ”
    This “new” information posted by the feds actually slams marijuana and perpetuates the anti-marijuana propaganda that has been espoused for decades by the federal prohibitionists. In fact, it gives them further justification in this “new’ carefully crafted propaganda ploy to keep marijuana a schedule 1 criminal “substance”.
    On the other hand, it simply plays into big pharma and their synthetic THC pills.
    I think you guys are asleep at the wheel.
    [Editor’s note: Asleep at the wheel, or ever vigilant for 40 years? What is notable about the NCI acknowledging cannabis’ therapeutic properties is that as little as 3 years ago the federal government (notably DEA, ONDCP, NIDA, etc…) would not yield any ground–insisting cannabis is hardly more than ‘Cheech and Chong’ pseudo medicine. No more post this NCI bulletin. No more.]

  43. # aaron…you’re right..at this moment fda and dea are working to get only parts of the plant changed to schedule I, but want to leave the plant as a whole illegal to use or possess

  44. “It’s never too late! – NEVER.”
    But – let’s not overlook the obvious! It’s never too late for who? If the whole plant material remains in schedule I – we’ve gained nothing – in fact – we’ve fallen farther behind. If only the natural THC is extracted – we’ve lost the other 60 plus cannabinoids. It’s obvious – the NIC/NIH endorsement only serves Big Pharma, and government retains control…”nothing new.” No Home Grow legislation – 02.01.11 Justice Department Memo – DEA raids on sovereign states – only justifies the means. If we look up “corruption” in the dictionary – there it is. All is not gold that glitters. But – let’s not look at the glass half empty.

  45. H2O: Dangerous Chemical!
    A student at Eagle Rock Junior High won first prize at the Greater Idaho Falls Science Fair, April 26. He was attempting to show how conditioned we have become to alarmists practicing junk science and spreading fear of everything in our environment. In his project he urged people to sign a petition demanding strict control or total elimination of the chemical “dihydrogen monoxide.”
    And for plenty of good reasons, since:
    1.it can cause excessive sweating and vomiting
    2.it is a major component in acid rain
    3.it can cause severe burns in its gaseous state
    4.accidental inhalation can kill you
    5.it contributes to erosion
    6.it decreases effectiveness of automobile brakes
    7.it has been found in tumors of terminal cancer patients
    He asked 50 people if they supported a ban of the chemical.
    •Forty-three (43) said yes,
    •six (6) were undecided,
    •and only one (1) knew that the chemical was water.
    The title of his prize winning project was, “How Gullible Are We?”
    He feels the conclusion is obvious.
    This is the perfect example of how we got into this mess!

  46. Well now they are doing it in Syria!!
    Hum??!!**!!
    Clash time……………
    420@4:20
    YES WE CAN!!!!!!!!!!!!*******!!!!!!!!!!

  47. I know we are close to legalization. Look how hard we have pushed and how hard they have pushed back?

  48. Try to convince the allmighty and all too powerful
    College des medecins de la province de Quebec that cannabis has anticancer properties and might be useful as a medication.Good luck ! You might hit a wall ! The truth is that most doctors in this world are pills pushers and anytrhing else that is not in a pill form simply has no medical value. How about putting a big cannabis bud in a big gelatin capsule

  49. With things like this constantly coming out, people should start listening to Rick Simpson and the cannabis extract movement a little more closely.

  50. Ths qoute is taken directly from the National Institute of Health’s web site. “In a”retrospective cohort study of 64,855 men aged 15 to 49 years, participants were divided into cohorts based on their use of tobacco and marijuana: never inhaled either, inhaled only Cannabis, inhaled only tobacco, and inhaled tobacco and Cannabis.[5] Among the nonsmokers, two cases of lung cancer were diagnosed during the follow-up period. Among the men who inhaled tobacco either alone or in addition to marijuana, the risk of lung cancer increased tenfold. In the follow-up of men who inhaled marijuana alone, no cases of lung cancer were documented.” Wake the kids and call the neighbors people this document is worth reading and NEEDS TO BE PASSED AROUND!!!!!. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional

  51. 72 kat
    Right!!! God made it for us – God gave it to us as a Sacrament. Because prohibs have dishonored his gift – I feel perfectly confident that they have pissed him off and God is now stalking prohibs for their disrespect and defiance. This 74 year prohibition is but a blink of God’s eye – but – “recognizing an eye for an eye” – when God exacts his punishment, perhaps prohibs will receive the same 74 year sentence.

  52. Hey government—stop the lies and corruption or you will deserve the consequinses.
    A Revolution for the Good of Man is NEAR!!!!
    Uncle Porky sat on a wall
    Uncle Porky had a great fall
    All the Kings Horses and All the Kings Men
    Couldn’t put Uncle Porky back together again.
    That’s what Greedy Government will do to itself.
    End the UNCONSTITUTIONAL Marijuana Prohibition today!
    Uncle Porky should’t be so greedy!

  53. Promoting marijuana as an aphrodisiac and as a cancer preventative is the key to acceptance.

  54. Isn’t this close what Nixons first panel decided…and then he fired them and got a different response from his toadies.
    What will Obama do?

  55. This is but another reason to show that Prohibition of this plant is wrong but will only be acknowledged by us.

  56. Hiya friends,
    Now let me ask you all a question: do you “really” think that this government is going to do a 180 on this? After all, we are dealing with liars and cheaters who have manage to fool the world for over 74 years. What makes you think they won’t try another dirty trick?
    Dont get your hopes too high. We are dealing with Satan here.

  57. This is all well and good but nothing is as it seems. Even though I would like nothing more than to applaud and be thankful for the efforts of these much needed entities. I cannot help but think it’s not being done for us, the people. You tell me one drug that has been on “the list” that they’ve come out and said it should be legalized outright? Name me one! You honestly expect me or anyone else to believe that once they “re-schedule” cannabis that somehow it will magically become legal in the future? Think about it. If cannabis were to become legal then the price would be driven down. That won’t do in a country of souls to sell. If they can find a way to keep a substance, cannabis, that is far less toxic than alcohol and tobacco, legal substances, from becoming legal and driving it’s price with the help of Pharms then everyone, BIG Mega-corps, govt. wins. Tobacco and alcohol will keep the majority of their clientele and Pharms will have yet another commodity, cannabis/HEMP/oils, in which to sell for a huge profit. Also the govt. will have a leg on which to stand concerning the fight against cannabis as just. Who’s really profiting from this move? Us? No! Care is a word I use loosely for these types cause to say that they actually care about those they wish to control is disingenuous. No doubt in my mind that I have pissed BIG PHARMA off. Pharma if you’re sincerely/truly sorry for what you did to my family then prove it, otherwise I will continue to spread the truth whether you like it or not. Was the life of my loved one not worth your time? Is their memory still alive? You lie about the lives you destroy and act as if you care. You may have all the money and power but I have one thing that you don’t. The truth and it will echo throughout eternity. What is your choice? Continue to keep locked the inherent knowledge which you possess as to it’s purpose only if you speak it. Or will you share your wealth of knowledge with the people who allow you to find yourselves high above and allow them to give thanks not for that which seeks control/power but understanding/forgiveness. Selfishness lies in the mind while selflessness resides in the heart. You prove time and time again where your loyalties lie. In the back pocket.

  58. I think its time for a schedule change! This study totally bebunks any notion that cannibus does not have any medical value and should be made availble for use by all cancer patients!

  59. Sunday 03.27.11 CDXX Communion.
    The greatest allegiance to God, on his sacred day, is to “be truthful – the truth be to God,” as much as it may hurt – and yes – the truth does hurt.
    Let’s get real – let’s be honest.
    Prohibitionists are “confirmed” agents of misinformation – “liars.” Perjury is a felony. Prohibs have “absolutely zero credibility.” As brethren, firmly in favor of humanity, we can only hope and pray that prohibs seek God’s forgiveness for their transgressions – otherwise their name [is] Mudd. It’s easy to resort to violence against liars, cheaters, and traitors because of their utter disrespect for our individual rights, and despicable acts against We the People and our Constitution – but – the best way to defeat them is to give deep moral support to the truth – and – kill them with kindness [until] we go to vote [then] piss on their name, exclude their unconstitutional crap, strip them of their Qualified Immunity – and – send them to hell for eternity. It would be “less than honest” to say that we would not feel justified in removing prohibs from our government – so – lets be the messenger with our mandate – and – “go all in” on 4-20 @ 4:20 [The 420 Invasion].
    Have a great CDXX Communion.

  60. And they will be able to tax it like alcohol and cigarettes that unlike marijuana does not kill hundreds of thousands of people, alot of them innocent victims, per year.

  61. This is all bull! They’ve known since at least the late 50’s about ThCs effects on various types of cancers. The shame of it is that in all of the time since then, they have been giving people Chemo! This won’t change anything because Chemo regimens are so damn expensive. They will continue to poison us and deny us Cannabis as long as we let them.
    -Oz

  62. Like David #33 pointed out isn’t it just strange how the DEA recently is trying to remove natural THC from Schedule #1 but leave the whole plant a Schedule #1 because whole plant cannabinoids can’t be synthesized by “you know who”?
    Then they arrest and convict people that are honestly trying to help other people with cannabis who are too sick to help themselves. At this point the US Government can’t hide their evilness any longer.

  63. Watch the south park episode, “Medicinal Fried Chicken” You’ll realize how ridiculous this is.

  64. What’s freedom for if we can’t use it?
    What’s freedom for if we can’t trust it?
    Who is trying to relieve us of our freedom?
    Maybe it has nothing to do with cannabis.
    Maybe it has everything to do with freedom.
    Maybe they are using cannabis as a distraction.
    Maybe they’re giving us the old run around.
    Maybe!!!
    Watch your back side!!!

  65. Nearly 2 decades ago, it was discovered that we have THC receptors in our brains. These nodes have no other porpose than to receive and process THC and Cannibanoids. Why are they there? Or better yet, how did they get there? This is a concept that spans all philosophies. Whether you beleive they were designed by God (Whichever diety you beleive in), evolution, Mother Nature, or put there by aliens is irrelevant. There they are. Our bodies were meant to injest this substance.

  66. it will not be moved to schedule 2.if this comes through,it will be schedule 3:)I believe that it is now time to bombard your local elected officials with this article and begin the push to make this happen as soon as possible.although a lot of these studies are decades old,we and the medical community can show them that this is a major breakthrough for the fight against cancer.I know that the pharmaceutical industry will try to fight this,being that they cannot control production and sales,but with both the medical community and the N.C.I. behind this,that will take away their power to stand in the way.I just hope that those that have the “stoner” mentality can keep their rhetoric to a minimum,as this is a serious health issue,not a “party” issue.it is just as bad as the propaganda minded rhetoric on the other side of this issue….

  67. Well – just an FYI.
    They have already edited the General Information section.
    Original – General Information, paragrapy 2
    The potential benefits of medicinal Cannabis for people living with cancer include antiemetic effects,
    appetite stimulation, pain relief, and improved sleep. In the practice of integrative oncology, the health care
    provider may recommend medicinal Cannabis not only for symptom management but also for its possible
    direct antitumor effect.
    Today – General Information, Paragrapy 2
    The potential benefits of medicinal Cannabis for people living with cancer include antiemetic effects, appetite stimulation, pain relief, and improved sleep. Though no relevant surveys of practice patterns exist, it appears that physicians caring for cancer patients who prescribe medicinal Cannabis predominantly do so for symptom management.
    Guess somebody pulled a Bozo No-No.
    .

  68. I think the Feds will soon have to admit the benefits of cannabis. I can’t wait to see it. Think about it. Since at least the mid 1930’s the feds have been saying how horrible it is, how it will make you go insane. How it will turn your children into murderers and rapists. See the movie “Reefer Madness” made by the government. Things haven’t changed much since.
    I guess it would be really hard to admit to the public how wrong and decieving they have been all these years.
    I’ve been using for medical purposes for over 10 years. It has made a huge, I mean, HUGE difference in my life. It’s not legal in my state by the way.
    I fail to understand how it’s ok for me to ingest enough morphine and hydrocodone to overdose any two average people just so I can go to sleep for 3 or 4 hours, but it’s not ok to take a few puffs from my pipe to do the same thing.
    That my friend, is really sad.
    Thanks for listening.
    dw

  69. Except… the National Cancer Institute website doesn’t say this. If you follow the link that this article claims the quote comes from there is nothing there about cancer having any use as a treatment of the disease, only the symptoms.
    [Editor’s note: Treating only the symptom? Wrong.
    From the NCI link:
    “Cannabinoids may cause antitumor effects by various mechanisms, including induction of cell death, inhibition of cell growth, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Cannabinoids appear to kill tumor cells but do not affect their nontransformed counterparts and may even protect them from cell death.”
    …The potential benefits of medicinal cannabis for people living with cancer include antiemetic effects, appetite stimulation, pain relief, and improved sleep. In the practice of integrative oncology, the health care provider may recommend medicinal cannabis not only for symptom management but also for its possible direct antitumor effect.”]

  70. Yeah and I own the patent on water and oxygen. Probably giving them ideas. The complexities in that one tiny seed are astounding!

  71. 101 Calcula7ed
    I wouldn’t be to sure about the fresh water – especially the bottled water. It’s been suggested that they are adding a few additives to bottled water – and – the bottles themselves. Up until now – water has cost more than gasoline – but – that’s changing. The air has been fucked up for a long time. It’s also been suggested that the air will soon contain viruses. Keep the faith!

  72. @ #101 :
    And we all thought that the movie “Spaceballs” was a comedy ! Can’t get that scene of Mel Brooks outta my head – cracking open that can of “fresh air” lmao

  73. Hope this gets up and starts moving, I have a dear friend that has cancer and I sure don’t want to see him leave us.

  74. sure canabinoids can cure cancer but smoking weed causes it because any burnt carbon is naturally a carcinogen

  75. 106 graysin
    CAUTION: Cannabis has not been proven to “cure” cancer. It has only been shown to stop or slow down the growth of cancer cells without effecting the healthy tissue. You have to cut off the blood supply [cancer food] to the effected tissue [and then] say a little prayer.

  76. Finally. Whats sad is that if they would have continued research back in the 70’s we would probably be close to a cure by now, or at least have a less painful/dangerous treatment (Chemo).

  77. My mother died in 1992 from colon cancer. She had Chemo and that stuff you can not put down a drain, but this goverment thinks it is safe for my mom to have it shot throught her veins.If this was legal then, my mom might not have died or she would at least not been in so much pain. Shame, shame on this goverment, for thinking they know what is best for us. They know nothing about us,they just want to control us and be in our lives!!If I knew then, what I know now, I would have forced my mom to try cannabis ,at least give it a try.

  78. what the hell we’re these guys thinking end the drug war it’s crap.makes life harder for me and a lot of other people.

  79. Is link available for the .gov version? And who will fund (and approve) human clinical trials? Tramatic brain injury seems to be an issue where cannabis helps; in my personal experience, especially with seizures, so perhaps a looking thru broad agency announcements could help with funding for returning vets (m.a.p.s. is working and sueing for approval to study). Perhaps a fund could be started to help with the cost of human double blind studies? if not the truth will stay underground…. Cannabis/Kava tinctures, terpenes, etc. should all be explored; big pharm and various agencies have plenty of money to hire teams of lawyers to keep the “be tough on crime” line, lotsof paychecks in that racket.

  80. Also it’s funny how neither alcohol nor tobacco/nicotine are listed in their ‘schedule of controlled substances.’ Why do they get to slide by? Nicotine very much does help the brain think, analyze, interpret information; however they can’t advertise that on tv because it’s also the most addictive natural drug on the planet. More addictive than heroin or cocaine.

  81. In fairness to those who think they are sincere defending the tobacco industry there is this assistance– “think, analyze, interpret”– attributed to nicotine, and thought might be given to how to get the benefit without the costs (addiction unto death etc.).
    I think (see @53, above) the problem is not the tobacco, or the nicotine, but the hot burning overdose serving system– $igarette– designed to trick the users into addiction to a 700-mg overdose every time they want a “smoke”. (Then the marketers (and taxing govts.) make more money.)
    Note that cigar and pipe tobacco users claim to be non-inhalers– they pump the smoke from harsh uninhalable tobaccos around over their mouthtaste and nosesmell organs, absorbing some of the nicotine into the brain through the mucous membranes. Their longevity figures are better than the big majority (1 bil. worldwide) of poor $igarette slave puff$uckers.
    Other options include ($$) vaporizers, ($) e-chillum, and (cc) a ONE-HITTER with a long flexible stem (drawtube) and a screened crater with 5.5mm (7/32″) inner diameter,
    into which you can insert a STANDARD SERVING (25 mg) of sifted bud particles,
    and holding the tip of the lighter flame 2-3 cm below the opening, heat the herb at least 15 seconds of slow drawing before letting ignite (which can be saved for a second halftoke).
    Then do 30 Warm Wet W’s in and out of a Lunchspielhaus (breadbag). Happy Goetherdaemmerung!

  82. I saw many errors in the comments; here are the facts. Cannabis has been proven to CURE cancer, ALL cancers. Smoking cannabis is not harmful in any way because the bits in the smoke that could be potentially harmful is immediately protected with the anti-cancer properties. No one has every died by overdosing on cannabis.
    [Editor’s note: It is beyond hyperbolic to declare that cannabis cures all cancers. No science supports such an overly broad claim. It is equally incorrect to assert that smoking cannabis is not harmful in any way. That is not what numerous scientific reports indicate.
    Are there some reports, using limited test subjects and limited amounts of cannabis, that both indicate that cannabis can be helpful in retarding some forms of cancer and that cannabis, as compared to tobacco smoke, is not as harmful? Yes. But to employ words like “cures all cancers’ or ‘not harmful in anyway’ is simply not true.
    NORML has been writing about cannabis, cancer and lung function for years…
    No doubt that cannabis should have been made legal yesterday, but trying to convince folks that cannabis cures all cancers and that inhaled smoke is not a problematic health concern will NOT hasten the end of Cannabis Prohibition.
    About the only thing worse than Prohibitionists that lie about cannabis are cannabis reformers who wildly exaggerate about cannabis. Both extremes should let the known science be their better guide.]

  83. back in 1972 a friend brought by a bottle of pure, sticky THC/CBD, then we went to the local restaurant after smoking a pinhead amount. if we could make that strength, with an easy to drink oily base, we could cure cancer.

  84. were talking three strains of cannabis, that saved our NAVY during WW2 making rope that NYLON failed at.
    Why are we so stupid? Can it be just greed. is that what capitalism is GREED?

  85. IT IS NEVER TOO LATE! Thank the stars and moon that we do know more and more daily, and that finally, the Feds will get their boots off our necks. My mom died in 1988 of breast cancer. She was 49. Had this been available during her life, would she have used it? WHO NKOWS? Doesn’t matter – we cannot undo the past. We can go forward so again, IT IS NEVER TOO LATE!

  86. Thats 36 years of “American Dark ages” thanks to Mr Government, and his corrupt ways.

  87. The myth that smoking cannabis causes lung cancer has already been debunked.
    “According to the Oncology Report, which posted today about the study, ‘In an analysis of marijuana smokers that excluded tobacco smokers, there were no significant differences in any of the comparisons, including habitual vs. nonhabitual use; number of joints smoked per day; duration of up to 20 years or duration of more than 20 years. The difference in risk is likely related to chemical additives in commercial cigarettes that aren’t present in most methods of inhaling marijuana smoke.’”
    “This new study validates research in 2006 by Dr. Taskin of the University of California which found that not only does marijuana consumption not lead to lung cancer, it may actually protect against it.”
    Read it for yourself here: http://www.theweedblog.com/new-research-finds-habitual-marijuana-consumption-not-linked-to-lung-cancer

  88. The NIH has been busy with weed in the last 36 they filed US Patent #6630507 back in Feb. 2nd of 2001 on the medical use of CBD (cannabidoil)in the full text there is a line that reads “Unlike present chemo medications that are all cytotoxic to both healthy as well as cancer cells, cannabidoil has been found to be cytotoxic to cancer cells, yet cytoprotective of healthy cells.”
    Read the synopsis of it straight from the US Patent Office here, http://uspatent6630507.com/

Leave a Reply