You Be The Judge! NORML’s SuperBOWL Marijuana Law Reform Ad Contest

Sure, tens of millions of Americans will be hunkering down in front of their television sets with friends and family tomorrow to ostensibly watch the Super Bowl between the Pittsburgh Steelers and Arizona Cardinals, but as we all know the day of the Super Bowl is America’s showcase for the most expensive and often creative commercial television advertisements of the year.

That’s all fine and dandy, but how much cooler is NORML’s first ever SuperBOWL Pro-Marijuana Law Reform Ad Contest? Heh?! Forget the painfully boring and tedious eight hours of Pre-SuperBowl television programming…watch and share all of these great pro-marijuana law reform ads.
$10,000 in cash prizes and NORML swag is up for grabs for the most creative pro-marijuana law reform ad—and YOU and your friends are the judges to determine this year’s winners.
Starting in September, NORML launched our third annual ‘NORML Ad Contest’, and after culling through hundreds of submissions, NORML’s staff and members of the board of directors recently narrowed the field to the top #25 videos for consideration in our first-ever online poll that will determine the contest’s winners.
Get This Contest Dug on Digg!
Please, tell all your like-minded friends, family and co-workers about NORML’s Ad Contest and encourage them to 1) vote once for their top three choices and 2) join NORML!
Voting online for the winners will last one week and end at midnight (PST), Sunday, February 7, 2009.
There is a terrific variety of videos, artistic creativity and passion for marijuana law reform represented in these top #25 contest submissions, and I want to personally thank the hundreds of NORML supporters who submitted videos and flash animations into NORML’s ad contest for consideration.

Advice for watching and judging NORML Ad Contest Videos: Mindful that you can vote one time and only choose your top three picks for winners, my recommendations are to watch the videos a number of times this week—possibly in different states of consciousness—and then hone in on your top three video choices for NORML’s best pro-marijuana reform ads. Also, for maximum viewing pleasure, when watching YouTube-based videos, it is best that the video first load entirely before viewing is initiated.

Like last year’s winning ad, and because of the generous financial support of NORML’s members, this year’s winning ad(s) will air in selected, local television markets in the United States, including President Obama’s new neighborhood here at the end of 16th Street, in the northwest section of Washington, D.C.*
Thanks again to this year’s contestants for standing up for what is right and for the many online voters who’ll pick this year’s winning pro-marijuana ad contest video or flash animation.
*Subject to local cable providers accepting NORML’s advocacy ads

0 thoughts

  1. In regard to the ad, in order to get the attention of not only President Obama, but those of the American public (and possibly other countries) who are still anti-marijuana, we need to focus on its benefits FIRST.
    Such as multiple studies which show:
    • Its medical benefits, as with Multiple Schlerosis, Parkinson’s Disease, glaucoma, alleviating nausea from chemotherapy, etc.
    • That it is NOT addictive, nor does it cause anything worse than possibly short term respiratory restrictions
    • That it causes far fewer problems – both medical and legal – than does alcohol
    • That unlike alcohol and tobacco, marijuana is NOT a contributory factor in the numerous deaths that have been attributed to the former
    • Used to assist in the alleviation of withdrawal symptoms of narcotics, in particular
    • That hemp products have far more beneficial uses than any other cash crops combined
    • That there have been 20 million arrests since 1965 which have unnecessarily cost billions of taxpayer dollars that could have been spent on disease cures or any number of other more profitable causes
    Additionally, the ad should show a wide variety of individuals who smoke or otherwise utilize marijuana, such as:
    • The elderly
    • The disabled (especially those in wheelchairs; focus mainly on the VISIBLY disabled)
    • Older teenagers over 18, especially college students
    • Professional and working class Men
    • Professional and working class Women
    • Athletes, celebrities, etc.
    • Various races (for instance an older white woman and a middle aged Hispanic, Asian or black man)
    Finally, as with one of Bobby McGee’s videos, have them articulate WHY they smoke or otherwise partake:
    • Medical reasons (should be first), such as pain relief, as an anti-emetic
    • To unwind or de-stress
    • To socialize
    • To have fun
    Most people are intelligent enough to see reason and are compassionate and empathetic. Give them legitimate reasons for WHY legalizing marijuana is a good idea, and they’re more likely to listen.

  2. Hello Gustavo,
    >So NORML will air an ad during the Super Bowl? Or are >these ads for local airing only?
    Unfortunately, no. Some of the winning ads (which will be announced next week after the online voting concludes) will be played on purchased TV air time in selected local cable markets in the US.
    At a minimum for $3.5 million for a 30 second ad (to say nothing of production costs for an actual Super Bowl quality commercial), I’m not sure NORML, or any drug policy reform group/ACLU, are ever going to be able to afford to advertise a TV spot during the Super Bowl.

  3. We just really need to somehow get to the point where these commercials are in everybody’s face, whether it be prime time or on the internet. I don’t know exactly how to go about doing that, but it seems like it’s the final stand in the war against prohibition. You can’t ignore something that everybody’s watching at once. NORML should campaign for donations for this cause, if they haven’t already. I’m only now starting to get involved, but I’d love to help out any way that I can.
    Oh and these commercials are GREAT, btw! I’m already having a hard time deciding my favorites. Very impressed so far with what I’ve seen! 🙂

  4. while we now know there is a growing problem with both the sickness and death caused by ciggeretes and the arrests caused by marijuana, changeing one problem and solving another we could turn ciggerete factories into a place for tree and stop the distribution of ciggerettes and start the legal sales (governmently controled) of marijuana.
    stop cigerettes and start hemp
    save lives and make money

  5. Ask him in the Super Bowl interview about helping his brother and the rest of the world out by recommending legalization, or at least the the world organization and treaty restrictions preventing countries who want to legalize from legalizing should be changed, in U.S. low fines only and no identification required to be shown to authorities!

  6. While I am seriously bummed my entry was not chosen. I definitely think y’all deserve a pat on the back for the timing, and pun of SuperBOWL.
    Should I admit it, or not, that I have no interest in watching it? My issue is PBS is not showing Sherlock Holmes tonight!

    G Obama, Michael Phelps 8 Gold medals and a bong, Santonio Holmes Super Bowl MVP, busted for marijuana, 1 game suspension last year.

  8. VERY IMPORTANT: Go to promise audit
    Notice anything missing. You won’t find anything about
    medical marijuana there. One of the most key battles in the war on prohibition IS REINSTATING THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE for broadcasters. Go to or wherever and demand the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE be reinstated. It won’t be long before those public opinion sites start filtering out any mention of marijuana reform. Reinstating the fairness doctrine is altogether different. Go to to learn more. If the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE was reinstated tv and radio stations who air ONDCP and other drug war ads would be REQUIRED BY LAW to air oppossing viewpoints. EXAMPLE at the end of this article is a disclaimer that the winner of the NORML ad contest will be aired on local Cable IF NORML CAN FIND A STATION TO AGREE TO SHOW IT. Under the fairness doctrine a station would have 2 choices either show NORMLS AD or cease showing ONDCP ads.

  9. One of the RACKETS the drug warriors use to enrich themselves is . They go to a Corporation and get $100,000 dollars to produce an anti marijuana ad. Then they spend $150 on the actual ad and pocket the $99,850. Believe me it does not cost more than a $150. to film a guy frying an egg, or a girl talking to her dog, or some kid taking off a t-shirt.

  10. Ok, i just watched all of them. First this could have easily been a top 8 or so. Some of these were just outright terrible. I liked the idea of the free credit report spoofs but they just didn’t pull it off. Cannabis Quandary had alot of great facts in it, and was well made.

  11. What can i say that hasnt been said,Its so nice to know there are so many intelegent like minded people out there.Change is a commin cant you feel it in the air.I think i will just kick back and make like Phelps,GURGLE…GURGLE…GURGLE…!!! OH..YEAH

  12. well i guess if we all got together next year & gave a dollar …we could have our own commercial during the “super-bowl”….mmm.imagine that

  13. This is not so much for the reform of marijuana but more so a possible solution to our economic problem. In some way, Congress needs to get the idea put infront of them that by reforming marijuana laws, can help save and bring in large sums of money. By cutting back on the DEA’s spending, By fewer arrests of these “criminals” that are taking up space and thousands of dollars in prisons the Gov. will be saving a great deal of money. The next helpful side to this, would be a form of marijuana produced and sold by the Gov. this is pretty much FREE for the Gov. to produce. Selling it can be close to a 100% profit since it is so easy to produce. Hell they could even make users apply for a permit that will bring in even more money, and they will be able to keep a record of who bought what, when, and how much of it. Its time for these laws to be reformed, and it couldnt couldnt be a more better time.

  14. #14 JP Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 9:45 pm
    Ok, i just watched all of them.
    First this could have easily been a top 8 or so.
    RE: JP,
    I completely agree.
    I narrowed it down to just those PSA’s which
    addressed Pres. Obama directly, though,
    which was only 8 videos.
    (However, there were a few videos, though not speaking to Mr. Obama directly,
    DID succeed presenting the needed facts concisely, professionally).
    JP: Some of these were just outright terrible.
    I liked the idea of the free credit report spoofs but they just didn’t pull it off.
    The gong-banging at the end of Crazy Cash might frighten some people away. And is Dr. Dankford a real, bona-fide physician, anyway?
    I also thought Judgement Day was more stoner-humor than a convincing presentation of facts. And it didn’t speak to Pres. Obama directly, either.
    JP: Cannabis Quandary had alot of great facts in it, and was well made.
    RE: Agreed. This is one got my vote!
    My favorite quote from CQ:
    “How could the President of the United States have EVER done such a thing?
    Maybe because he knew it was less addictive than both alcohol and nicotine,
    and knew it could be consumed responsibly…”

Leave a Reply